Yes, I am for that. We pay enough real estate, city and federal taxes that anyone armed and trespassing should be fair game. Only way to prevent crime is to be able to repulse an intruder. This country is becoming way to lenient on crime. Illegal, armed, trespassing=3 strikes and you are out.
Aren't both in the wrong? Are you advocating just shooting someone walking on your land?
They were on HIS and with weapons.
The original post doesn't mention weapons. Completely different.
If someone is on my property and I inform them to leave. And they refuse to leave... Weapon or not, I have a right to use force
So someone is walking across a field and they are unarmed and you think its ok to shoot them? Fucking maniac.
If someone points a gun at me on my property, damn right I'm gonna put them on a T shirt. just saying
Yea I would advocate for shooting an armed intruder on my property, fucker doesn’t want shot , he shouldn’t be there . End of story
Yes, I am for that. We pay enough real estate, city and federal taxes that anyone armed and trespassing should be fair game. Only way to prevent crime is to be able to repulse an intruder. This country is becoming way to lenient on crime. Illegal, armed, trespassing=3 strikes and you are out.