I've noticed a pattern that I hope I'm wrong about. Reading these pages at GAW, I am constantly looking for hope, some evidence of somebody doing something forward looking. I am not able to find it. I asked a question in another thread whether anybody on this planet is developing a trustworthy voting system. Crickets. One bot showed up and told me we have lost nothing, and losing the ability to have fair elections won't amount to anything. So far not a soul has contributed to that thread and provided any examples of voting systems being developed. That's the pattern. Complain all you want, wallow in the mud like a depressed pig, but don't you dare talk about anything that would change the status quo peacefully.
So talking about how bad things are is totally acceptable, but making any mention of peacefully changing that in any effective way is verboten. Change my mind.
I appreciate everyone's comments, but they are all fitting the pattern I've noticed.
A mod comes in and says basically don't worry about it everything's fine.
A person claims paper ballots and hand counting would fix everything. That didn't stop a corrupt sheriff in Athens from commandeering the ballot boxes to give himself time to alter them before the hand count.
Another suggests it should be verboten to talk about it at all. Security, you know.
Another suggests having faith is all you really need.
And a great suggestion that Q and the plan will take care of it all and we can just sit back and watch the movie.
And then right on cue, another person shows up to remind us that this has to get bloody. The next step of course, is that this thread gets "flushed."
Do you see what I'm talking about?
I get the notion OP wants "torches & pitchforks" threads to be acceptable....
If that's the case, they can take their violent mantra over to fedboi central: PDW. They'll certainly allow anyone to incriminate anons with the notion of hostile kinetic change.
Beware that people monitoring this site also my make post to see how this community reacts. We are being studied, make no mistake of it.
Remember VOAT. Here is their dataset from voat monitoring and read the conclusion paragraph.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2201.05933.pdf
Boom! Well said!