911 Where is the Plane wreckage?
(www.bitchute.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
The Pennsylvania crash produced a large hole into which the plane had plowed. There was wreckage and debris. It was buried in a memorial. It is remarkable how much a plane will disintegrate upon a hard crash. The establishment of a memorial is wholly at odds with your presumption that someone wanted this to be a non-memory.
I saw no 'wreckage' in the PA 'hole' in any photograph that was taken. Look again. Plane wreckage, by law, is collected and reconstructed. There was nothing to collect or reconstruct....from ANY of the crash sites! That's an impossibility....especially from PA and the Pentagon. There are innumerable 9/11 'memorials'. I can't even stomach watching or listening to anything said by our government "in memory" of the people they killed. IMO it was a false flag event where MANY were killed and others were blamed...THAT is the memory they want kept alive.
They got wreckage and pieces from the Twin Towers. They got wreckage and pieces from the Pentagon. They even got wreckage from Pennsylvania, but it is now buried. (It looks like Flight 93 may have gone to ground at a steep angle, mostly burying itself.) Reconstruction is normally pursued in order to deduce what caused an accident. Since there was nothing accidental about any of these collisions, and the pieces had been so thoroughly torn up, there wouldn't have been much point in attempting a reconstruction.
There is only one Pennsylvania memorial and it does display artifacts remaining from the passengers and fragments of the airplane.
You have a LOT to prove, with evidence, that the government was responsible. That may even be true, but just having an opinion is pretty worthless.
Well, believe it or not, I'm sticking by my "worthless" opinion. I've watched and listened to plenty of videos by experts and professionals to question the 'official' story and, as scary as where that conclusion takes me, I can no longer be convinced actual planes were involved.
Then you have graduated to believe in fantasy. How do you know these "experts" were correct? I notice you haven't countered any of my information, which is based on expert understanding of combustion. I have mentioned the various claims made in ignorance of the facts. In your opinion, do you think it is wiser to ignore the facts?
That "large hole" supposedly produced by Flight 93 pre-existed the crash. Quite the "coincidence", wouldn't you say, for a plane to fall out of the sky into a pre-existing crater? lol
And who says it pre-existed? A conspiracy enthusiast?