We know he apparently undermined his own movie and everyone in it by including video of people collapsing who weren't vaxxed. It was the primary lead during debunks.
I'm willing to consider he's just been undermined, but he often forces things in very inelegant ways despite a seemingly solid budget.
Who has that much money and time to crank out movies and programming on ideas they haven't vetted? It's a spook activity. Real people have jobs and families. Who is this guy?
I'll go far out there with another one: Steve Kirsch. Obsessed with the idea that Hamlin is vaxx injured even though the whole thing obviously could have been staged. MIT connections. Stew Peters connections. The guy has been begging for a chance to debate the vax and I listened to him collapse in the @iancopeland5 Twitter stream in a pathetically unprepared and emotional manner.
Now if you're thinking mirror and looking for a deep undercover white hat, consider iancopeland5 because he is upping the intellectual rigor of his alleged opponents (us), vs. feeding us what we want to hear (Steve and Stew).
We know he apparently undermined his own movie and everyone in it by including video of people collapsing who weren't vaxxed. It was the primary lead during debunks.
I'm willing to consider he's just been undermined, but he often forces things in very inelegant ways despite a seemingly solid budget.
Who has that much money and time to crank out movies and programming on ideas they haven't vetted? It's a spook activity. Real people have jobs and families. Who is this guy?
I'll go far out there with another one: Steve Kirsch. Obsessed with the idea that Hamlin is vaxx injured even though the whole thing obviously could have been staged. MIT connections. Stew Peters connections. The guy has been begging for a chance to debate the vax and I listened to him collapse in the @iancopeland5 Twitter stream in a pathetically unprepared and emotional manner.
Now if you're thinking mirror and looking for a deep undercover white hat, consider iancopeland5 because he is upping the intellectual rigor of his alleged opponents (us), vs. feeding us what we want to hear (Steve and Stew).