I see your points.
I just don't know how to do you measure this.
I would think it would be based on the experiences of each person.
For Example:
I am black.
A white kid lived across the street from me.
When I would go out and play in the front yard.
I would see the kid playing in his front yard.
We would always look at each other.
One day his mom said he could go over.
So he crossed the street and said "What are you playing with".
He became one of my best friends that I know close to 40 years later.
It's natural when we live in a society that is still in the jungle.
Group preference has a benefit when humans are in primitive times.
This group preference during these times is for pure survival reasons and nothing else.
Keep this in mind. Language is the key to all of this.
I don't agree that a baby would understand in-group decisions. A baby needs to have a "no trust" mindset toward everyone but their parents.
Which is why God says "Honor your mother and father".
It's why a lot of parents say "Do not trust strangers" to their young kids.
In America.
The in-group mindset you are talking about is because of the lies the Cabal has pushed.
It's because of the social pressure that the Cabal uses to activate fear of survival.
In my view.
God is the greatest engineer ever. We have different groups of people to provide the world with a variety of mating and social options.
Instead of saying we want freedom. We should change it to "We want options".
A good friend of mine in college was a white guy. He only dated white women with blonde hair. I see him reject attractive white women with dark hair.
So what did he do there? He picked an option.
It's like an assembly line. There are many different car models.
Well... there are many different human models and options to pick from.
That's how I see the world.
I think group preference depends on how harsh the environment we live in is. It's only a temporay mindset in the harshest of environments.
And Scott proves what I am saying to be true.
Scott just created "In Group" preferences by reacting to a poll/study. He did not naturally think this way.
A poll made him scared (fear) blacks. So he reacted and said that whites just need to move away from blacks.
He wasn't born with this mindset. He was pushed into that mindset via a simple poll.
This is the power of polling and messaging. This is how in-group preferences are created.
Most of it is from fear-based statistics, videos, audio, text, etc.
Most of the people that fear another ethnic group. Have no real bonds with that group.
I see your points. I just don't know how to do you measure this.
I would think it would be based on the experiences of each person.
For Example:
I am black. A white kid lived across the street from me.
When I would go out and play in the front yard. I would see the kid playing in his front yard.
We would always look at each other.
One day his mom said he could go over. So he crossed the street and said "What are you playing with". He became one of my best friends that I know close to 40 years later.
So I just don't know how would you test for this.
The In Group perference comes from the parents who were taught to say away from other groups.
So they pass that mindset onto their kids.
That doesn't make logical sense.
What you are referring to is the idea that a young having a natural bond with their parents make sense.
What natural benefits would a young child get for having a biologically innate trait for the same groups?
A young kid's mind is very immature. They do not know cultural norms or values. This comes from their parent's teachings.
Send me a peer-reviewed study that explains in detail HOW they collected their sample.
I am assuming they used a Straffied Random Sample which is not the same as a true random sample.