I fully understand natural rights, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. I honestly think you don't understand what was taught in civics class.
How you are equating pursuit of happiness to having the right to squash anything that make you unhappy is unsettling. Do you understand how this can be abused?
Let me quote this again;
The law must be narrowly tailored to achieve an important government interest that is unrelated to the suppression of speech.
I think you have liberal and conservative mixed up in this because a conservative would want to preserve the constitution. House Republicans adopted a "requirement that every bill must cite the provision of the Constitution which permits its introduction."
The restrictions are typically created via time, place and manner. Saying there are existing municipal laws and restrictions that violate the first amendment is not an argument in favor of them.
"Sense of decency", "Act like morons", "Vulgar Language" etc are all subjective opinions. It's not up to you to decide how an individual expresses themselves. This is one of the foundations.. you are allowed to say things that I do not like.
You do not know that as fact, you know what you know as fact. Language is neutral and it's our responsibility to teach people that words can't hurt you. The only thing that can hurt you is how you perceive the words you're hearing. Again, this is subjective material and you can't blanket statement it to everyone.
It's scary that there are tyrants here who align with policy that the globalists would be in favor of.
Well, I won't debate you, because you are firmly-set in what you believe. However, equating me with globalists is ill-advised. Vulgar language is "incendiary" -- that's why people use it, because it evokes anger and crudity. (You are kidding yourself if you think it's neutral.) Globalists want us fighting amongst ourselves, and divided. Language is how that is accomplished.
I didn't address this in my previous comment, but to clarify the case I referenced was a supreme court ruling; Do you have a comment now knowing this?
In Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971), the Supreme Court established that the government generally cannot criminalize the display of profane words in public places.
Language isn't how that is accomplished. People not understanding that words can't hurt them is how that is accomplished. I am going to leave you with the following, if you don't want to respond to it, feel free not to.
In short, ‘perception is projection’ means that we each project your own attitudes, behavior and beliefs onto others. The world is YOUR own mirror!
A wise man once said;
“The only genuinely true thing is that, for better or for worse, we each get to decide how we see and interpret things.”
How you interpret this idea will determine whether you like it, dislike it, agree or disagree with it. Fact.
Everything we see is neutral, but we have no neutral thoughts about what we see. The thoughts we have about the situations we face will determine how we perceive our situations. All situations are empty space until we decide what they mean to us!
The world is what you think of it. Change your thoughts and you change the world. What you believe will be mirrored in what you see. If you believe there are no good opportunities in life, you will inevitably find a way to prove yourself right.
If you believe that you can grow and improve, you will. If you believe that no-one can be trusted, you’ll trust no-one and likewise, no-one will trust you.
Life is difficult when you believe it must be difficult.
I can tell you, from both personal experience, and professional experience (I was a career correction officer), that the use of vulgar/profane language has a profound effect on one's mental state, and can be an indication of (or precedent to) neurological degradation.
I fully understand natural rights, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. I honestly think you don't understand what was taught in civics class.
How you are equating pursuit of happiness to having the right to squash anything that make you unhappy is unsettling. Do you understand how this can be abused?
Let me quote this again;
I think you have liberal and conservative mixed up in this because a conservative would want to preserve the constitution. House Republicans adopted a "requirement that every bill must cite the provision of the Constitution which permits its introduction."
The restrictions are typically created via time, place and manner. Saying there are existing municipal laws and restrictions that violate the first amendment is not an argument in favor of them.
"Sense of decency", "Act like morons", "Vulgar Language" etc are all subjective opinions. It's not up to you to decide how an individual expresses themselves. This is one of the foundations.. you are allowed to say things that I do not like.
You do not know that as fact, you know what you know as fact. Language is neutral and it's our responsibility to teach people that words can't hurt you. The only thing that can hurt you is how you perceive the words you're hearing. Again, this is subjective material and you can't blanket statement it to everyone.
It's scary that there are tyrants here who align with policy that the globalists would be in favor of.
Well, I won't debate you, because you are firmly-set in what you believe. However, equating me with globalists is ill-advised. Vulgar language is "incendiary" -- that's why people use it, because it evokes anger and crudity. (You are kidding yourself if you think it's neutral.) Globalists want us fighting amongst ourselves, and divided. Language is how that is accomplished.
Need I say more?
I didn't address this in my previous comment, but to clarify the case I referenced was a supreme court ruling; Do you have a comment now knowing this?
In Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971), the Supreme Court established that the government generally cannot criminalize the display of profane words in public places.
Language isn't how that is accomplished. People not understanding that words can't hurt them is how that is accomplished. I am going to leave you with the following, if you don't want to respond to it, feel free not to.
In short, ‘perception is projection’ means that we each project your own attitudes, behavior and beliefs onto others. The world is YOUR own mirror!
A wise man once said;
“The only genuinely true thing is that, for better or for worse, we each get to decide how we see and interpret things.”
Everything we see is neutral, but we have no neutral thoughts about what we see. The thoughts we have about the situations we face will determine how we perceive our situations. All situations are empty space until we decide what they mean to us!
The world is what you think of it. Change your thoughts and you change the world. What you believe will be mirrored in what you see. If you believe there are no good opportunities in life, you will inevitably find a way to prove yourself right.
If you believe that you can grow and improve, you will. If you believe that no-one can be trusted, you’ll trust no-one and likewise, no-one will trust you.
Life is difficult when you believe it must be difficult.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0261927X18758143
Language use in dementia and Alzheimer's patients: https://www.verywellhealth.com/foul-language-and-dementia-97610
I can tell you, from both personal experience, and professional experience (I was a career correction officer), that the use of vulgar/profane language has a profound effect on one's mental state, and can be an indication of (or precedent to) neurological degradation.
I’m going to hard disagree with you on your language assertion. I’m fluent with mental health, disease and NLP.
I’m not interested in arguing that, I am more curious about your opinion about the Supreme Court ruling. Was the Supreme Court wrong?