I think this is important posting because the jury is out on this and it appears there's some early calls based on very limited information u/Meme_war_ii_vet posted this earlier and I though there was some good commentary on it.
I commented earlier to his Tracy Beanz post and said:
"Now Tracy Beanz is prematurely casting doubt on J. Thuler. She says, "In a previous court filing against his ex wife, Thaler included a listing of bankruptcy’s he alleged were forged by Brittany Thaler. I’ve researched about 10 of these using access to federal bankruptcy cases and they are filed by real people, with real identities, and real debts. I will continue to do my due diligence on this - a lot of reading and a lot of litigation."
To me this ambiguous. And its awful to discredit the entire work of J. Thuler with an ambiguous finding as this. How do we know Beanz is privy to any of the documents J. Thuler has? I'm not saying one way or another. I'm saying it's way too early to start casting arrows."
As a reply on agreeing with u/CasuallyObservant comment I said the following:
"That's the thing I am noticing here with Sundance over at CTH, Brian Cates, and now Tracy Beanz. They all assume because J. Thuler started all of this from a child custody battle, the documents are all hearsay and baloney. I'll tell you this, when it comes to child custody and trying to get your kid back you'll find some of the greatest mind-blowing research done. I mean its detective work with a personal mission. So yes, J. Thuler could have very easily discovered a paper trail and all the things you mentioned above and more. Once a rabbit hole like this is discovered, it's a eureka moment. The motive to follow it completely through makes a complete case. This is what lawyers do. They have to answer all the questions. Also consider J. Thuler has been legally targeted and arrested over this custodial issue. When the judge is acting very peculiar in your case and showing obvious bias, it in itself becomes a motive to understand the judge's behavior (and motive) so that your name will be cleared."
"I have seen some of the most extraordinary cases of research come from child custody battles. J. Thuler's research and discoveries doesn't surprise me when it comes to his motivation and resolve. If Thuler's documents are validated by vetted attorney's like Dr. David Clements, who was a former New Mexico prosecutor & law professor, he might be a good choice. Other organizations may be True the Vote, 100% Fed Up, et. al would be very helpful. Right now, the enemy is attempting to bury this story. The AZ Senate has the documents. Now, it's time to get the right people to verify it all. And move this ahead."
Pretty much True I think and sometimes these acts of paternalism, after being villainized or even criminalized, will go beyond the law. Pretty powerful instincts we are dealing with. To control society is to control the children. And there is this purposeful reason why the divorce racket exists. If you read the 1958 Cleon Skousen's classic "The Naked Communist" you'd start to see that one of the goals of communism is to destroy the family. I recall one listed goal was to make divorce easy. It is not surprising, in circa 1961 'no fault' divorce was adopted in the United States. Already, introduced in Europe, it originated from Bolshevik Soviet Union. Those 45 goals of Communism are remarkable for their accuracy to which we are winessing today.
I don't know how to point you to what I just posted in this thread, but read that and tell me you still think Beanz is premature. It's ok if you still do. Just curious if what I found changes your mind.
Yeah, Tracy Beanz is Right, because certain ""Documents"", surely cannot be Faked, or Forged, or anything like that....
Take a Social Security card, there's absolutely no possible way that you can take one down to the local Office Depot, or Kinkos, and find out what type of Paper it's on, because that would be a ""National Secret"", and nobody that has worked with Paper, would be able to recognize that specific type, RIGHT????
There's also No Way to Color Copy the Front and Back of the Social Security Card, on Any Machine anywhere, because those Machines haven't been invented just yet, and then it's Impossible to Type in the Numbers, because they haven't invented the Machine for Typing in Numbers either....
Well someones got to play the Devils Advocate, without one, there cannot be any worthwhile determinations....
Just because I say a specific thing, does not mean I believe it, I say it to make people think not just in one direction but at least two, which, if true, it is a sign of a healthy mind to be able to hold two opposing views without bias toward either one....
And Devils advocate is the way to help others do that....
Did you see my response to allowmetoexplain when you waggishly said "all of this is just one huge ball of ""Lets Pretend"? (Right above your post.) You might be interested in the scope of J. Thuler's saga.
I think this is important posting because the jury is out on this and it appears there's some early calls based on very limited information u/Meme_war_ii_vet posted this earlier and I though there was some good commentary on it.
I commented earlier to his Tracy Beanz post and said:
As a reply on agreeing with u/CasuallyObservant comment I said the following:
When your child is taken from you, you'll do anything to get him back.
Pretty much True I think and sometimes these acts of paternalism, after being villainized or even criminalized, will go beyond the law. Pretty powerful instincts we are dealing with. To control society is to control the children. And there is this purposeful reason why the divorce racket exists. If you read the 1958 Cleon Skousen's classic "The Naked Communist" you'd start to see that one of the goals of communism is to destroy the family. I recall one listed goal was to make divorce easy. It is not surprising, in circa 1961 'no fault' divorce was adopted in the United States. Already, introduced in Europe, it originated from Bolshevik Soviet Union. Those 45 goals of Communism are remarkable for their accuracy to which we are winessing today.
I don't know how to point you to what I just posted in this thread, but read that and tell me you still think Beanz is premature. It's ok if you still do. Just curious if what I found changes your mind.
Yeah, Tracy Beanz is Right, because certain ""Documents"", surely cannot be Faked, or Forged, or anything like that....
Take a Social Security card, there's absolutely no possible way that you can take one down to the local Office Depot, or Kinkos, and find out what type of Paper it's on, because that would be a ""National Secret"", and nobody that has worked with Paper, would be able to recognize that specific type, RIGHT????
There's also No Way to Color Copy the Front and Back of the Social Security Card, on Any Machine anywhere, because those Machines haven't been invented just yet, and then it's Impossible to Type in the Numbers, because they haven't invented the Machine for Typing in Numbers either....
Oh whatever shall we do???
I'm picking up your facetiousness here.
Well someones got to play the Devils Advocate, without one, there cannot be any worthwhile determinations....
Just because I say a specific thing, does not mean I believe it, I say it to make people think not just in one direction but at least two, which, if true, it is a sign of a healthy mind to be able to hold two opposing views without bias toward either one....
And Devils advocate is the way to help others do that....
Did you see my response to allowmetoexplain when you waggishly said "all of this is just one huge ball of ""Lets Pretend"? (Right above your post.) You might be interested in the scope of J. Thuler's saga.