let the record show that you're here on GA to help us by shilling the establishment medical narrative that is REPLETE with DELIBERATE FLAWS & ASSUMPTIONS,

Yet you have failed to show one instance where germ theory or viral pathology are incorrect, and your own theory has zero predictive power.

I find this remarkable actually. You must be EXTREMELY NEW to GA/Q/Conspiracy Reality.

Ah, the old argument of "my opponent disagrees with me, therefore they're an idiot". Nice ad hominem. I've been in the Q space for at least 2 years now. So what? Seniority does not magically bestow legitimacy.

This is the FUNDAMENTAL problem you have - blind belief in authority.

Asking for evidence and logic equals blind belief in authority.... right. Whatever you say.

[on whether Covid is a bioweapon] And yet again, asserting what is unproven. You're a blind believer in the authoritative narrative.

But the idea that Covid is a bioweapon runs counter to the dominant medical establishment. So then I am not blindly believing authority, if I was I wouldn't be on GAW in the first place.

Because you assert again and again and again that I can't possibly achieve this. [prove that bacteria/viruses aren't the cause of disease]

I never said you couldn't, I said you haven't. Not once have explained how emotional states or phobias trigger illnesses, you just assert that this is the case and expect me to believe you because you're anti establishment, which ironically is itself a call to blind belief in authority.

"He who makes the claim bears the burden of proof". And in all we're discussing, the CLAIMANT is undeniably our trillion-dollar medical establishment cabal. So is this the "flaw" you wish to investigate?

Being a multi-trillion dollar industry is neither a crime nor a flaw. If so, then the scam artists who push flat earth, NESARA, and germ theory are guilty of the exact same thing on a smaller scale.

The problem we're going to have here is that you don't realize that what you have accepted as "evidence" of your BELIEFS is anything but.

You are pushing the claim that the evidence for germ theory is bunk. That's YOUR claim, which means YOU have to defend it.

You'd think after all we've been through the past 3 years, you'd be open to what I say and doing some investigation of your own.

I am open to those who make reasonable arguments and put forward evidence, you have done neither. I'm still waiting for which strain of Hepatitis excessive anger causes, and how the heck an emotional state causes an blood-borne pathogen/STD.

Not once did you say - "well, what you say is certainly interesting, what led you to these conclusions"? Not even once. All you've done this far is attack, attack and attack what I've said from a deeply EMOTIONAL state of FEAR.

Pointing out potential problems and lack of evidence is a golden opportunity for you to explain how you arrived at your conclusions. Yet you have failed to do so; you have only doubled down on your assertions with no explanation and failed to address the contradictory evidence that I provided. Putting your theory under scrutiny is not an attack, it is how ideas are forged and refined. All theories should be subject to scrutiny, and if you view that as an attack, all it shows is that you are the one who is afraid of criticism.