I'm here to spread wisdom and pointers to truth to like-minded people.
It's not wisdom if it contradicts reality.
Well if this is the case, it won't take us much time for you to see that I'm correct in my assertions.
Nope, because you still haven't explained why emotional states cause cancer, and you still haven't provided any evidence for your beliefs.
Nothing I said was RANDOM, I can assure you of that.
Lets review:
If she felt she becomes scared of what will happen to her, she gets bronchitis, whooping cough, throat/larynx issues. If she then has an existential/abandonment crisis on top of the the scare conflict, in time she gets pneumonia - water retention in the lungs. If she feels she can't earn a living to care for her children, she gets a starvation conflict which causes liver cancer. If she fears her husband will take the kids, she has a separation conflict and gets ductal breast cancer. If she becomes angry, she gets hepatitis. If she becomes extremely angry, she gets stomach cancer. If it turns out her husband was actually having a homosexual affair and perceives this as a "dirty conflict" and gets bladder or colon cancer. If she decides to retaliate and get revenge through a brutal fight over the property and money she gets pancreatic cancer.
Fear = bronchitis, existantial crisis = pneumonia, starvation confilict = liver cancer, separation anxiety = breast cancer, anger = hepatitis or stomach cancer (which have no relationship with each other), retaliation = pancreatic cancer. This is called randomly assigning various conditions to various emotional states or stressors. Ironically over half the conditions you listed involve neither bacteria nor viruses, so even if you were right it still wouldn't disprove germ theory.
Bonus question: Is a woman's period caused by a fear of pregnancy or fear of sexual intimacy?
True. Can you disprove this claim?
Nope, not how this works. YOU assert that the body manufactures bacteria, it's YOUR job to prove it.
I made no such claim. [That TB has a less than 1% mortality rate]
Earlier:
99% of the time, there's nothing "lethal" about this perfectly natural process. [TB]
If TB isn't lethal 99% of the time, then it's mortality rate is 1%. That's how percentages work. Or is math an establishment concoction too?
It's not wisdom if it contradicts reality.
Nope, because you still haven't explained why emotional states cause cancer, and you still haven't provided any evidence for your beliefs.
Lets review:
Fear = bronchitis, existantial crisis = pneumonia, starvation confilict = liver cancer, separation anxiety = breast cancer, anger = hepatitis or stomach cancer (which have no relationship with each other), retaliation = pancreatic cancer. This is called randomly assigning various conditions to various emotional states or stressors. Ironically over half the conditions you listed involve neither bacteria nor viruses, so even if you were right it still wouldn't disprove germ theory.
Bonus question: Is a woman's period caused by a fear of pregnancy or fear of sexual intimacy?
Nope, not how this works. YOU assert that the body manufactures bacteria, it's YOUR job to prove it.
Earlier:
If TB isn't lethal 99% of the time, then it's mortality rate is 1%. That's how percentages work. Or is math an establishment concoction too?