I know some very smart normies and conservatives who would rather be persuaded to join the circus than read Q posts. They have mental road blocks, such as the fear of judgement by their spouses or peers.
So that's the challenge. I want to develop a strategy for cracking the toughest cookies. I don't mean dogmatic libs; they're lost for now. I mean someone who is rational and respects you enough to allow a 20 minute sales pitch but will only give you one shot.
So it would have to be a simple and strong argument or proof, yet still within the city limits of Normietown. This means no Angela Hitler, no locking up Obama and Hillary in Gitmo, no Satanic pedos.
I'm thinking I would start by explaining that Q is a propaganda campaign by Military Intelligence to undermine the criminality of the Clintons, Obama, and the deep state. I think many normies can accept that. Then I'd move on to some juicy FISA gate posts. Or a personal favorite: Blunt and Direct Time. The Lord's Prayer is also a good one.
Let me know your ideas on which normie-friendly proofs or arguments you think are the strongest to start with.
Why are normies, normies?
It is an anomaly to deeply research anything that occured 5 years ago. 10 years ago.
We all have an inclination about caring only about a few select things. Not a slew of disparate issues, for example: Steve Mnuchin and the Fed, Benghazi, Michael Flynn and Putin in 2013, the PURGE OF AL-WALEED in Nov 2017. All disparate events. We're out of the norm, simply by definition.
You need to do more digging into what topics really set your particular normie off. Is it the 2nd amendment? Abortion? Drugs? The War on Terror? Ill effects of social media? Surveillance? War on Christianity? LGBT Agenda? Cost of manufacturing? Farming?