Correct me if I'm wrong, but everything I've seen over the last few weeks I saw years ago. Jim Jordan doesn't even seem to be talking about it anymore.
What's with the slow roll? I'll tell you what it is. Trump would be Vindicated.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
Yeah, I'm not going to take Tom Sietsema of Washginton freaking Post at his word. Especially when it directly conflicts with the reality we see today.
The hate toward Tucker looks a lot like the hate Elon used to get around here until it became so obviously wrong. I figure the Tucker hate will go the same way.
Unless you have something more damning to share? I looked over the GAW thread and didn't find anything convincing there either.
Thank you concern troll for identifying yourself. You just checked all the boxes.
Tune in to Tucker tonight!
In case you missed it, we are the news. But not you, you're not the news, you're a concern troll.
Quite silly to call me a troll, but whatever.
Honest question: can you come up with a theory to explain how it would benefit the cabal for Tucker to emphasize the importance of releasing the J6 footage to the public?
Can you take a guess as to why he would even bring it up at all, if he were cabal-controlled?
I'm genuinely interested to hear an alternative take, but it needs to be coherent and consider all the facts.
This thread is about Jim Jordan's promise to release January 6 footage, I have no idea why you made it by Tucker Carlson. The only explanation is you're a concern troll. It's not silly, I've been at this for years and I can spot you clowns from a mile away.
Dude, Tucker is central to the issue of the J6 tapes. All but one of the other comments mention him.
You engaged me about Tucker. Are you bowing out, or will you consider my request?