The Facts Are Clear: Infectious Disease Deaths Declined nearly 90% Before Vaccines Were Introduced
In the United States (and other countries), historical records show that disease mortality declined nearly 90% before the introduction of the vaccine program and routine vaccination programs — as stated in the Trends in the Health of Americans report.
In fact, some of the most prevalent diseases in the early 1900s — including Tuberculosis (TB), Scarlet Fever and Typhoid — followed the same declines WITHOUT ever having a vaccine program (in the US). These diseases were nearly eradicated in the U.S. without the population being vaccinated for them. ........
Today, the most prevalent cause of disease is from environmental chemical toxins that attack the neurological system and cause cancer and auto-immune diseases, et. al. In 2002, Dr. Tom Mack of USC stated --
“My credentials include probably spending more time working up [analyses of] population-based outbreaks of smallpox than virtually anybody ever has.”
Mack then stated --
“If people are worried about endemic smallpox [long lingering or permanent presence of the disease in the population], it disappeared from this country not because of our mass herd immunity [derived from a vaccine]. It disappeared because of our economic development. And that’s why it disappeared from Europe and many other countries…[its disappearance is] not from universal vaccination.”
- “The informed consent that you would have to prepare to vaccinate somebody in the public, if it’s honest, would have to say that dangers would exceed the benefits.”* BOOM.
“Most important determinant to the eventual number of [smallpox] cases is whether or not somebody gets put in the hospital. And everything should be done to prevent that.” “Unexposed [to the smallpox disease] community members have negligible risk. There is a substantial risk from a vaccine…It is the single most dangerous live vaccine.”
In 1900 (page 566) there were 64.0 deaths per 100,000 due to cancer.
In 1993 (page 29) there were 205.6 deaths per 100,000 due to cancer.
A 321% increase in mortality is kinda a red flag.
If only epidemiologists would look at data instead of the news for their info we might be able to do something about the real epidemics.
Thank you for this information. THIS is the reason why GAW is the news. It is people like you providing information and revealing the LIES and FRAUD being told to us. That's a 3.2 times increase in cancer. Yet, even with this dramatic increase, despite the vast improvements to sanitation, hygiene, and nutrition, cancer increased contrary to all 'old world' diseases. Why? This is where Dr. Tom Mack's of USC statement about environmental chemical toxins that attack the neurological system and cause cancer come into consideration.
I might add, your 1993 statistic is at the very beginning of when vax☠xine safety was flagrant neglected as lawfully required by Congress, and as we know it is nothing but a sham, showing that the government agencies we are to trust are not doing their jobs to ensure and improve the safety of immunizations.
The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 compels DHHS to take responsibility for improving efficacy and safety of vax☠xines; and charges them with continuous monitoring and improving of adverse event reporting. The DHHS is also tasked with providing a report on improvements by the Mandate for Safer Childhood Vaccine clause to the Congress at least every 2 years.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr and ICAN sued the US Government about the safety of vaccines, and won discovery. We know vax☠xines have not been tested for efficacy and safety for over 30 years. Despite Kennedy Jr. win, nothing has changed and Big Pharma being a Juggernaut of vast revenue has only increased their financial power and influence. Autism soared in the early 1990s after the vax☠xines schedule for children was increased from 10 to over 30 inoculations. An increase in cancers has been linked to vax☠xines. I am certain the cancer rates have increased remarkably from the 1993 statistic you provided.
This is all very true...vaccines were not necessary and actually turned out to be harmful...as did many treatment protocols...
Because we stopped living where we shit, hygiene is responsible for 99% of reduction in disease
Agreed. Hygiene is prevention. Prevention is 100% of good practices.
AND BOTH go hand-in-hand...LOOK at Penn...they are still getting over 3 Mile!!!
I would be very curious to see a long term detailed study of Amish and other "old-fashioned" lifestyle peoples that live in a "first world" environment. What is the occurrence of autism, cancer, endemic diseases, mental illness, etc. I will run through the NIH database and see if any studies have been done. I have a suspicion that they are far healthier and less inclined to disease than some of our more modern city dwellers and modern farmers that utilize chemicals.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7449360/ As we all now know, cardiovascular disease is not associated with cholesterol in the manner that was once believed, in fact it is inverse to commonly held beliefs.
Reference: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17512433.2018.1519391
More on the Amish: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6842432/ (Relating to Asthma in children)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6648804/ (GI bacteria and prevalence of allergies in children) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9114685/ (Amish and lower occurrence of alzheimers) There are a few other studies, but it certainly has a trend that shows that Amish people are healthier and have a later age occurrence of diseases and ailments.