Behind those Secretive Doors What Affliction On The Human Race Are They Trying to Create?

posted 1 year ago by Tewdryg 1 year ago by Tewdryg +7 / -1

I can't help but to think of this being referenced in Revelation 16:1:

1.And I heard a great voice out of the temple saying to the seven angels, Go your ways, and pour out the vials of the wrath of God upon the earth.

2.(1) And the first went, and poured out his vial upon the earth; and there fell a bad and evil (+) sore upon the men, which had the (2) mark of the beast, and upon them which worshipped his image.

(1) The history of the first Angel, whose plague upon the earth, is described almost in the same words with that sixth plague of the Egyptians in Exodus 9:9 . But it doeth signify a spiritual ulcer, and that torture or butchery of conscience seared with a hot iron, which accuseth the ungodly within, and both by truth of the word (the light whereof God hath now so long shewed forth) and by bitterness stirreth up and forceth out the sword of God's wrath.

(+) This was like the sixth plague of Egypt, which was sores and boils or pocks; and this reigneth commonly among Canons, monks, friars, nuns, Priests and such filthy vermin which bear the mark of the beast.

(2) See Revelation 13:16

3.(3)And the second angel poured out his vial upon the sea; and it (a) became as the (+) blood of (♣) a dead man: and every living life died in the sea.

(3)The history of the second Angel, who troubleth and molesteth the seas, that he may stir up the conscience of men sleeping in their wickedness; Revelation 8:8 .

(a) It was turned into rotten and filthy blood, such as is in dead bodies.

(+) This is like to the first plague of Egypt which signifieth all kinds of pestilences and contagious diseases.

(♣) That is, corrupt and infected. Is this the undead? Like the walking dead?

I find it provocative that of all the terms, it is the word -- "vial" that is repeatedly used in Revelation.

6 comments

6 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (6)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– Totsugeki 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

However you are not recognizing phiálē the English and modern meaning of it.

Yes, that's exactly what I'm doing because the Bible was not written in English or for modern audiences. I am deferring to the original language rather than translator bias.

permalink parent save report block reply

– Tewdryg [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Very well. We can call it a "shallow bowl". However, it doesn't really change anything.

1.And I heard a great voice out of the temple saying to the seven angels, Go your ways, and pour out the ~~vials~~ shallow bowl of the wrath of God upon the earth.

2.(1) And the first went, and poured out his ~~vials~~ shallow bowl upon the earth; and there fell a bad and evil (+) sore upon the men, which had the (2) mark of the beast, and upon them which worshipped his image.

Using ~~vials~~ shallow bowl doesn't affect the meaning because the modern use of vial is categorically similar. The etymology is indeed always important, so you raise a good point.