This had better not be true
(media.gab.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (59)
sorted by:
It might be that both parties don't want to fix anything--then what would they run on if there was nothing to fix? I hear a local talk show host, Derek Hunter, say this a lot. The way things are going, it appears that he may be right. However, if we look at what the Democrats attack Conservatives for, constantly, clean air and clean water and that they attack grandma. Well look at what has happened in East Palastine they have dirty air and dirty water. Look what the Democrats have done to assist them, nothing. So who really wants clean air and water?
Not quite. Republicans, as a party, want a structure where there is law, peace, and prosperity. Once this is done, it only needs to be preserved. But true, there are many RINOs in there now, the GOP is largely occupied by enemy forces eyeing reelection and personal gain instead. Democrats, on the other hand, must drive change - and in order to drive change, you have to identify or create constant problems. The Dems have no destination to seek. Dems require constant human struggle for their fuel and they must churn hard to maintain relevancy, while GOP wants humanity to throttle down government and let it idle, with secure freedom for people. The GOP (party) does want to fix things and become unnecessary, but the politicians squatting in it do not; Dems can never fix anything because they will become unnecessary (and they don't want to.)