I disagree. I think Covid was a bioweapon. It was released in stages. It was first released in China back in Aug of 2019... there were fever clinics all over China. This was their first test...to release a less pathogenic strain...test the waters. They already had the Vaccines - Moderna was already shipping off their Vax in Feb 2020 for trials...loooong before would have been expected in normal vax development.
There was another release during the military games in China. And finally, a third release which hit the US about late Nov 2019 - Dec 2019. Many in the US were sick with a respiratory illness then. I was one of them.
The virus, was designed to damage specific people - I think there's a genetic component to it. I think it behaved...unexpectedly. After all, nature will change and mutate a virus at whim.
Regardless...by and large...Covid turned out to not be very lethal - we all know that. However...it damages the blood...the spike protein is a binding protein...and depending on where that spike attaches, will determine what kind of binding you get - respiratory congestion, blood clots, heart inflammation...this depends on the person - where they express the most Ace2 receptor.
We know Covid is a bioweapon. We know this because it was being researched for gain of function study at the Level 4 lab in Boston, who, under their grant from the NIAID, was to investigate possible bioweapons.
But here's the thing - the vax didn't perform as expected either. When making a vax from a bioweapon...well...not a good idea. Using the deadly spike protein as the blueprint for your vax...not a good idea. Naturally the vax, being injected (as opposed to inhaled) caused injury - a lot of injury...and in ways, never predicted.
Now, they are trying to cover their a**ses. However - the release of the bioweapon did its job. It allowed for the country to be shut down - a massive shift of wealth into the corporate sphere further empowering the WEF and its leaders. And the removal of their #1 enemy - TRUMP.
In 2020, “blood clots, heart inflammation” were not included in covid symptoms. These problems came from the vaxx, and then the liars tried to retcon. They’re still trying to call vaxx problems “long covid”.
“We know Covid is a bioweapon. We know this because it was being researched for gain of function study at the Level 4 lab in Boston, who, under their grant from the NIAID, was to investigate possible bioweapons.”
The evidence of funding of gain of function/ bioweapon research just shows that they tried. It doesn’t show that they succeeded. If the bioweapon research did succeed, their new invention performed similarly enough to existing colds and flus not to be worth the R&D expenditure.
An authentically novel coronavirus strain wasn’t needed for the marketing campaign of covid. They could’ve done the same hoax using the old flu, which was already killing tens of thousands a year. Without novel covid, they still could’ve deliberately infected vulnerable old people with the flu. They still could’ve blocked ivermectin and hcq. They still could’ve killed people with Remdisivir/ Veklury and with ventilator misuse. They still could’ve misattributed irrelevant deaths to covid.
The specious argument that covid is technically different from flu but the effects are the same… isn’t practically different than just saying covid is the flu.
Also to your point about blood clots and heart inflammation - I don't think that's an immediate symptom. I think this type of inflammation takes time to develop - and I also think it's pretty rare as a Covid side effect. But I do think it happens for some.
But most of the clots and heart issues are from the vaxx. The vaxx nanoparticles travel all over - past the blood brain barrier, etc. The studies in Japan showed it traveled to most organs with heavy deposits in the spleen, ovaries, and I forget what else at the moment - but the biodistribution was all over.
Meanwhile Covid enters via the respiratory tract - and a person has many natural defenses via the respiratory tract before it even hits the lungs.
So getting Covid was always less dangerous than the vaxx.
No - what I was saying about the biolab is that per their grant, they could only do research on agents used in "chemical and biological warfare." Since they were doing research on Covid, that indicates it's an agent used in chemical and biological warfare.
Covid was a bioweapon. It was edited multiple times to include inserts from SARS, HIV, and something else I can't remember at the moment. That French Noble prize winner, who died - he said early on it was edited. It's obvious it comes from a lab to all who have bothered to look.
Also - I'm not saying the vaxx isn't causing problems so I don't know why I have so many down votes. The vaxx absolutely causes problems - major problems. But Covid, imo, can also cause problems and IS causing problems for some.
People who had a mild case are quick to dismiss it as a "flu" - but how can you hold two concepts in your head at once? That it's nothing, and that it was made as a bioweapon and released from a lab? Do we really think they spent years working on a frivolous, harmless bioweapon that is nothing more than a common cold? I suppose you could believe that... but that's not what I've seen.
Like I also said - 99% or even higher, have mild symptoms from Covid...but I still don't think it started that way. I think it was more severe...I think as it passed through the population it became more mild. It attenuated. The French noble prize winner said the same - that nature would eliminate those edits over time - I think that's what we've seen.
“Do we really think they spent years working on a frivolous, harmless bioweapon that is nothing more than a common cold? I suppose you could believe that... but that's not what I've seen.”
I think they tried to make the most efficiently evil shit imaginable, but it’s not as easy as some might think. There’s the ever present struggle of transmissibility vs lethality. Too nasty, and it kills before it spreads. Too weak and it doesn’t cull the herd. The gain of function goons might not have been able to improve upon the balance of the flu that has evolved over thousands of generations.
There were trials - but they only followed the participants for 8 weeks. And the participants were what's called "healthies" - meaning they excluded those who were overweight, had any preexisting conditions, and were within the limited age range of like 18 - 60 (I don't remember the exact age range)... but you can go to clinicaltrials.gov and read the studies yourself. Basically they pick the healthiest specimens they can to minimize the number of reported side effects... And this alone is unscrupulous, as your average American is anything BUT healthy!
I remember reading the trial results when they first published them - they clearly stated they only tested whether or not the vaxx could reduce mild to moderate symptoms...and when I say mild and moderate, we're talking like very mild if I remember correctly - like 2 symptoms (of the cluster of symptoms they called covid) - like fever, headache, congestion, fatigues, etc. I believe you needed like one symptom and a positive PCR to be called "covid positive."
Anyway...that was their clinical endpoint. Reduction of symptoms. They NEVER looked at whether or not it controlled transmissability. So when the gov't ran that narrative that "this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated," I knew right away, they were full of sh*t. But what's absolutely amazing (and not in a good way), is how the CDC and FDA went ALONG with it all. Of course..some left the agencies...but yeah - it just proves the collusion between pharma and the gov't.
So in short...there were studies. The other thing was they kept talking about their 100% effective or 95% effectivity rate - which was a total scam...as that just gave us relative risk reduction instead of total risk reduction. Total risk reduction (meaning reduction of risk for the TOTAL population) was LESS THAN 1%!!!
So the way they pushed this poison on everyone was just unbelievable. But I digress...
I disagree. I think Covid was a bioweapon. It was released in stages. It was first released in China back in Aug of 2019... there were fever clinics all over China. This was their first test...to release a less pathogenic strain...test the waters. They already had the Vaccines - Moderna was already shipping off their Vax in Feb 2020 for trials...loooong before would have been expected in normal vax development.
There was another release during the military games in China. And finally, a third release which hit the US about late Nov 2019 - Dec 2019. Many in the US were sick with a respiratory illness then. I was one of them.
The virus, was designed to damage specific people - I think there's a genetic component to it. I think it behaved...unexpectedly. After all, nature will change and mutate a virus at whim.
Regardless...by and large...Covid turned out to not be very lethal - we all know that. However...it damages the blood...the spike protein is a binding protein...and depending on where that spike attaches, will determine what kind of binding you get - respiratory congestion, blood clots, heart inflammation...this depends on the person - where they express the most Ace2 receptor.
We know Covid is a bioweapon. We know this because it was being researched for gain of function study at the Level 4 lab in Boston, who, under their grant from the NIAID, was to investigate possible bioweapons.
But here's the thing - the vax didn't perform as expected either. When making a vax from a bioweapon...well...not a good idea. Using the deadly spike protein as the blueprint for your vax...not a good idea. Naturally the vax, being injected (as opposed to inhaled) caused injury - a lot of injury...and in ways, never predicted.
Now, they are trying to cover their a**ses. However - the release of the bioweapon did its job. It allowed for the country to be shut down - a massive shift of wealth into the corporate sphere further empowering the WEF and its leaders. And the removal of their #1 enemy - TRUMP.
JMHO.
In 2020, “blood clots, heart inflammation” were not included in covid symptoms. These problems came from the vaxx, and then the liars tried to retcon. They’re still trying to call vaxx problems “long covid”.
“We know Covid is a bioweapon. We know this because it was being researched for gain of function study at the Level 4 lab in Boston, who, under their grant from the NIAID, was to investigate possible bioweapons.”
The evidence of funding of gain of function/ bioweapon research just shows that they tried. It doesn’t show that they succeeded. If the bioweapon research did succeed, their new invention performed similarly enough to existing colds and flus not to be worth the R&D expenditure.
An authentically novel coronavirus strain wasn’t needed for the marketing campaign of covid. They could’ve done the same hoax using the old flu, which was already killing tens of thousands a year. Without novel covid, they still could’ve deliberately infected vulnerable old people with the flu. They still could’ve blocked ivermectin and hcq. They still could’ve killed people with Remdisivir/ Veklury and with ventilator misuse. They still could’ve misattributed irrelevant deaths to covid.
The specious argument that covid is technically different from flu but the effects are the same… isn’t practically different than just saying covid is the flu.
Also to your point about blood clots and heart inflammation - I don't think that's an immediate symptom. I think this type of inflammation takes time to develop - and I also think it's pretty rare as a Covid side effect. But I do think it happens for some.
But most of the clots and heart issues are from the vaxx. The vaxx nanoparticles travel all over - past the blood brain barrier, etc. The studies in Japan showed it traveled to most organs with heavy deposits in the spleen, ovaries, and I forget what else at the moment - but the biodistribution was all over.
Meanwhile Covid enters via the respiratory tract - and a person has many natural defenses via the respiratory tract before it even hits the lungs.
So getting Covid was always less dangerous than the vaxx.
No - what I was saying about the biolab is that per their grant, they could only do research on agents used in "chemical and biological warfare." Since they were doing research on Covid, that indicates it's an agent used in chemical and biological warfare.
Covid was a bioweapon. It was edited multiple times to include inserts from SARS, HIV, and something else I can't remember at the moment. That French Noble prize winner, who died - he said early on it was edited. It's obvious it comes from a lab to all who have bothered to look.
Also - I'm not saying the vaxx isn't causing problems so I don't know why I have so many down votes. The vaxx absolutely causes problems - major problems. But Covid, imo, can also cause problems and IS causing problems for some.
People who had a mild case are quick to dismiss it as a "flu" - but how can you hold two concepts in your head at once? That it's nothing, and that it was made as a bioweapon and released from a lab? Do we really think they spent years working on a frivolous, harmless bioweapon that is nothing more than a common cold? I suppose you could believe that... but that's not what I've seen.
Like I also said - 99% or even higher, have mild symptoms from Covid...but I still don't think it started that way. I think it was more severe...I think as it passed through the population it became more mild. It attenuated. The French noble prize winner said the same - that nature would eliminate those edits over time - I think that's what we've seen.
“Do we really think they spent years working on a frivolous, harmless bioweapon that is nothing more than a common cold? I suppose you could believe that... but that's not what I've seen.”
I think they tried to make the most efficiently evil shit imaginable, but it’s not as easy as some might think. There’s the ever present struggle of transmissibility vs lethality. Too nasty, and it kills before it spreads. Too weak and it doesn’t cull the herd. The gain of function goons might not have been able to improve upon the balance of the flu that has evolved over thousands of generations.
My understanding was that no trials, zero was done on the vaccine, except for some testing on 6 mice, am I wrong?
There were trials - but they only followed the participants for 8 weeks. And the participants were what's called "healthies" - meaning they excluded those who were overweight, had any preexisting conditions, and were within the limited age range of like 18 - 60 (I don't remember the exact age range)... but you can go to clinicaltrials.gov and read the studies yourself. Basically they pick the healthiest specimens they can to minimize the number of reported side effects... And this alone is unscrupulous, as your average American is anything BUT healthy!
I remember reading the trial results when they first published them - they clearly stated they only tested whether or not the vaxx could reduce mild to moderate symptoms...and when I say mild and moderate, we're talking like very mild if I remember correctly - like 2 symptoms (of the cluster of symptoms they called covid) - like fever, headache, congestion, fatigues, etc. I believe you needed like one symptom and a positive PCR to be called "covid positive."
Anyway...that was their clinical endpoint. Reduction of symptoms. They NEVER looked at whether or not it controlled transmissability. So when the gov't ran that narrative that "this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated," I knew right away, they were full of sh*t. But what's absolutely amazing (and not in a good way), is how the CDC and FDA went ALONG with it all. Of course..some left the agencies...but yeah - it just proves the collusion between pharma and the gov't.
So in short...there were studies. The other thing was they kept talking about their 100% effective or 95% effectivity rate - which was a total scam...as that just gave us relative risk reduction instead of total risk reduction. Total risk reduction (meaning reduction of risk for the TOTAL population) was LESS THAN 1%!!!
So the way they pushed this poison on everyone was just unbelievable. But I digress...
Thankyou, appreciate it.