IT’S BIBLICAL !!!👀🙏
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (56)
sorted by:
Amen!
Personally, these are all essential to understanding doctrine correctly. I don’t care if some new bibles have made these a footnote. Some of these are Jesus’ own words.
Missing in NLT and ESV
Mathew 17:21 “However, this kind (demons) does not go out except by prayer and fasting.”
Mathew 18:11 “For the Son of Man has come to save that which was lost.”
Mathew 23:14 “Woe to you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you devour widows’ houses and for pretense make long prayers. Therefore you will receive greater condemnation. (Jesus speaking)
Mark 7:16 “If anyone has ears to hear, let him hear.” (Jesus speaking about defilement)
Also…
Mark 9:44, 9:46 (Jesus talking about hell)
Mark 11:26 (Jesus talking about forgiving others)
Mark 15:28. (Proving scripture was fulfilled re: Jesus’ death)
None of these verses, if removed, have any effect on any major doctrine (Divinity of Christ, Death/Burial/Resurrection of Christ, Authority of the Scriptures. etc...) .
Now, lets consider the only 4 options regarding examples like you list.
1) These verses are original and one or more scribes mistakenly omitted it.
2) These verses are original and one or more scribes intentionally deleted it.
3) These verses are not original and one or more scribes mistakenly added it.
4) These verses are not original and one or more scribes intentionally added it.
Which one do you choose and why?
Evening!
I think (as I’ve stated before) all is essential to doctrine. And that there is (and has been) some shady stuff going on with translations.
Yes, essential doctrine is there. But seems a slippery slope to me.
2Timothy 3:16 All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness,
So I have to wonder why they would edit Jesus’ words.
My .02