Don't dox me for the love of god please, I have children and I'm just a passionate hobbyist
I made claims. You want the proof, I've got the proof, here's the oscilloscope readings to prove it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNyyG1ECN2Q&t=195s
That machine currently makes 50 KV sparks.
That machine is pushing milli-amps of current to make those voltages on that resistor. that means that the machine can push that current at 50 KV.
To make a 1 volt drop over a 1 kilo-ohm resistor requires the transfer of 1 milli-amp of current. As you can see in the video: much more than that is made.
If the voltage is drop is 2.5 volts, then the current through the resistor is 2.5 milliamps.
The machine can deliver that at 50,000 volts 50,000 volts * 0.0025 amps = 125 watts
When the machine is perfected, it will make 208 KV and the sparks will have to cross the bars instead of shorting through the insulation.
That drill spins at up to 2700 rpm, it's running on 120 volt, it uses a maximum of 4.6 amps of current. So that drill, at it's maximum output power uses 552 watts. That drill is not being pushed that hard to make what I am already making, I have a 60 watts pump motor that does this just fine other than the fact I need to buy a speed controller so that I don't rip my fittings apart on startup and so that I can stop it from spinning at max speed.
I can't even go over 1200 RPM yet because of balancing issues...
Now obviously, that output is going to need to be rectified and conditioned, but there it is.
It's not even working right yet and the max output is already reaching overunity levels.
I believe you. Just spitting facts. On a different note, did you see the newer videos that explained the new tech that space force is using? I don't understand the technical mumbo jumbo but they apparently can bend space time and slip through the aether. Like that tictac video that showed a craft flying at great speeds just above the ocean and also in the water? I'll try to find, but they described it as a zero point energy.
Carry On!!!
No I did not see that, I've been obsessed for over a month straight. Can you link me? That sounds really cool.
Isn't it funny how if you're primary goal is to heat a location, you could use a wood stove which is condsidered to be up to 80% efficient with modern ones or you could use resistive heaters like baseboard units, which are also considered to be ~100% efficient or you could use a heat pump and freeze one location while simultaneously heating another location and relocate >1.8 times the amount of energy it took to spin the pump.
Somehow people think that isn't free energy... even if the primary goal and intention was to heat a specific thing, a heat pump could be used to give energy to endorthermic chemical reactions.
People say, well the heat wasn't created, the energy came from somewhere else, but so did the energy in the wire for the electric heater, that's kind of a cop-out argument.
I think that free energy is a proven reality and has been since the first heat pump with a coefficient of perfomance over 1.0 has been made.
What's your thoughts on my way of looking at that?
Here to go..... I personally don't like the narrator BUT the info is in here.... Crazy tech
https://youtu.be/A8z_gyo83fc
ty
That's a pretty brilliant summation. The best advice is always to ignore the ones that speak on things they know nothing about, hence the naysayers. It's almost human nature to shun things we don't understand, unfortunately there's more uneducated than educated these days and most of them don't know when to listen.
I'll dig for that info.... I'll post a link in a bit.