probably how they rushed to get him somewhere they could chop his head up like a melon to retrieve the bullet and try to disguise the exit wound in the back of his head.
For what it's worth, the International Wound Ballistics Association examined the autopsy report and concluded there was nothing amiss with the ballistic conclusions. They resolved some misunderstandings about the findings. These were non-political people and they were only interested in forensic accuracy.
and we know their motives how? not many agencies/associations aren't compromised or compromisable. furthermore, how can we even believe the autopsy report? I'm not one to speak intelligently about the detailed inconsistencies and suspicious things since this JFK matter hasn't piqued my interest enough, but it seems clear that not much can be trusted
"Their motives how?" What motives? I was a member of the IWBA and took their Journal where the analysis was published. I read the analysis. No lurking inconsistencies with the behavior of bullets in human subjects. Everything consistent with the use of an Italian Carcano carbine in the hands of a competent marksman. And there is no implication from this. You have no basis whatsoever to gratuitously impeach the integrity of an organization you are ignorant of. I might as well doubt YOUR integrity. Do you ever think of that?
It has nothing to do with the Warren Commission Report, and I don't trust that report at all. But there is no reason to doubt the autopsy. Why should there be? Kennedy was killed by gunshot. There is no point in dwelling on the autopsy when that has nothing to do with the possible conspiracy behind events.
What would you have to impeach the report? And what is wrong with the conclusion that Kennedy was shot by Lee Harvey Oswald? Or why would it make any difference whatsoever? When you have no basis for complaint, blow smoke.
probably how they rushed to get him somewhere they could chop his head up like a melon to retrieve the bullet and try to disguise the exit wound in the back of his head.
For what it's worth, the International Wound Ballistics Association examined the autopsy report and concluded there was nothing amiss with the ballistic conclusions. They resolved some misunderstandings about the findings. These were non-political people and they were only interested in forensic accuracy.
and we know their motives how? not many agencies/associations aren't compromised or compromisable. furthermore, how can we even believe the autopsy report? I'm not one to speak intelligently about the detailed inconsistencies and suspicious things since this JFK matter hasn't piqued my interest enough, but it seems clear that not much can be trusted
"Their motives how?" What motives? I was a member of the IWBA and took their Journal where the analysis was published. I read the analysis. No lurking inconsistencies with the behavior of bullets in human subjects. Everything consistent with the use of an Italian Carcano carbine in the hands of a competent marksman. And there is no implication from this. You have no basis whatsoever to gratuitously impeach the integrity of an organization you are ignorant of. I might as well doubt YOUR integrity. Do you ever think of that?
It has nothing to do with the Warren Commission Report, and I don't trust that report at all. But there is no reason to doubt the autopsy. Why should there be? Kennedy was killed by gunshot. There is no point in dwelling on the autopsy when that has nothing to do with the possible conspiracy behind events.
<insert navy seals meme copypasta>
examining a report is completely different from examining the body.
What would you have to impeach the report? And what is wrong with the conclusion that Kennedy was shot by Lee Harvey Oswald? Or why would it make any difference whatsoever? When you have no basis for complaint, blow smoke.