Logical refutation of the global warming scam
(files.catbox.moe)
Comments (10)
sorted by:
Lady is lucky she didn't ask the question years earlier.. He would've smacked the gender off her face
The earth has the same amount of water that gets redistributed by rain and rivers.
Where is this ten foot of water comin from?
If the ice in your glass melts does the glass overflow?
They say: Antarctica, because unlike the Arctic, that is not floating ice.
Plymouth rock still on dry land
If a glass of water was filled to the brim and had ice floating in it, with a significant amount of it sticking above the surface, gradually that ice would melt (assuming room temperature), and the extra liquid water would overflow.
I don’t understand what you’re saying. There’s a lot of ice above sea level, or otherwise removed from the ocean. Ice melts into water. More water in any container means a higher water level.
Global warming is wrong but not for this reason
This kind of logic is too simple.........
I’ve researching climate change scam recently because I see orgs and others on social media always premise their argument with global warming as a given and thus we need to do X Y Z usually involving taking vast sums of money through tax.
Anyways researching theory based on “astronomical harmonics” basically temperatures are changing cyclically based on movement of large planets largely Jupiter and Saturn. Makes sense as slight variations in gravity would induce weather changes etc. but several cycles overlayed on top of each other one particular is a 60year cycle but there are others.
If anything I’ve read some researchers predicting a mini ice age as happened in 1600//1700s IIRC.
Lower crop yields thus more wars.
I DO believe they are fucking with the weather.