That last link took forever to find actually. Because it has been two years since all this retardation. And most f what I remember seeing and reading is not able to be found in the internet due to two years worth of scrubbing. But hey, this was just me rounding up some information to browse through for those too lazy to go seek it out themselves.
That last link took forever to find actually. Because it has been two years since all this retardation. And most f what I remember seeing and reading is not able to be found in the internet due to two years worth of scrubbing. But hey, this was just me rounding up some information to browse through for those too lazy to go seek it out themselves.
Apologies for any misunderstanding. I thought the info you provided was very helpful. It's certainly a step in the right direction.
PS. The "low effort" comment was a comment regarding the linked article, NOT a comment on your effort, which is far from low, imo.
I don't know if laziness is the key reason some people don't investigate. Not everyone has unlimited time to search and dig on everything.
I do think that if people don't make the effort to dig, but draw conclusions and make evaluations without even attempting to dig, that's pretty lazy.
Personally, I don't understand how or why so many draw absolute conclusions regarding Chansley, but fail to offer evidence or critical digging.
But maybe I'm just the same....