SVB is in receivership, but we don't yet know how unbalanced the books are and that will be the real story.
It's trivial for a powerful group to run out a banks cash, but it doesn't necessarily mean they're banking improperly (in the debt-based money sense of proper).
In theory they should be able to sell all illiquid assets and zero out, so why is Swalwell already talking bailout? Why wasn't a sale of the bank arranged?
SVB is in receivership, but we don't yet know how unbalanced the books are and that will be the real story.
It's trivial for a powerful group to run out a banks cash, but it doesn't necessarily mean they're banking improperly (in the debt-based money sense of proper).
In theory they should be able to sell all illiquid assets and zero out, so why is Swalwell already talking bailout? Why wasn't a sale of the bank arranged?
What dirt hasn't been released?