No no no, we don't let them get us to define ourselves as "intolerant". That's a bad thing to be, and a bad thing to be wrongly accused of.
No, we're DISMISSIVE.
Dismissive of the mentally ill and the sex deviants forcing the rest of us to play make-believe. "You're dismissed." End of discussion.
Dismissed. As in "You can leave now, the door's over there."
This gives them the proper amount of attention they deserve, which is none. "Intolerant" IMHO puts US on the defensive; makes US look small-minded; certainly invites the opinion that maybe we SHOULD be "tolerant" of whatever it is we're "intolerant" of; and gives the sex deviants WAY too much attention.
We aren't intolerant any more than we're "UN-vaxed". We don't allow the lowest elements of society to define us by what we are not and what they are. Instead, we are FREE of blood poisons, a/k/a freeblood; and we're freethinkers who are DISMISSIVE of deluded sex deviants.
Yes but no
No no no, we don't let them get us to define ourselves as "intolerant". That's a bad thing to be, and a bad thing to be wrongly accused of.
No, we're DISMISSIVE.
Dismissive of the mentally ill and the sex deviants forcing the rest of us to play make-believe. "You're dismissed." End of discussion.
Dismissed. As in "You can leave now, the door's over there."
This gives them the proper amount of attention they deserve, which is none. "Intolerant" IMHO puts US on the defensive; makes US look small-minded; certainly invites the opinion that maybe we SHOULD be "tolerant" of whatever it is we're "intolerant" of; and gives the sex deviants WAY too much attention.
We aren't intolerant any more than we're "UN-vaxed". We don't allow the lowest elements of society to define us by what we are not and what they are. Instead, we are FREE of blood poisons, a/k/a freeblood; and we're freethinkers who are DISMISSIVE of deluded sex deviants.
Just a suggestion... :)