I believe that there are much safer speculated resolution than Devolution
In summary, the Devolution speculation is that there is maybe laws in place that will resolve all your challenge. I do not believe that. Because if you look at the FACTS, the facts contradict Devolution. When I make a choice, if I can choose between FACTS and SPECULATION, I always choose FACTS. For example, right now, there are still laws being passed that are really bad for you. Those laws directly contradict Devolution. In other words, when there are conflicting information between facts and speculations, I usually choose facts. The facts do NOT support the Devolution speculation.
Because I believe that for citizen to have real security and real prosperity, the best strategy is for citizens to actively and peacefully resolve any challenges. For example, but not limited to, do your own research, listen to various opinion. Then make your own opinion. They make life choices based on YOUR own research. NOT on someone else research.
One of the core speculation of Devolution is that citizen should be apathetic and inactive. So that speculated "laws" will solve their life challenge. I believe the opposite. Thus, I do not support Devolution.
This is the most moronic take on Devolution I've ever seen. Devolution is the most accurately laid out tenet in our entire movement. Guaranteed you believe in flat Earth. 100%, I'd bet the farm on it.
I do not support Devolution. Why?
I believe that there are much safer speculated resolution than Devolution
In summary, the Devolution speculation is that there is maybe laws in place that will resolve all your challenge. I do not believe that. Because if you look at the FACTS, the facts contradict Devolution. When I make a choice, if I can choose between FACTS and SPECULATION, I always choose FACTS. For example, right now, there are still laws being passed that are really bad for you. Those laws directly contradict Devolution. In other words, when there are conflicting information between facts and speculations, I usually choose facts. The facts do NOT support the Devolution speculation.
Because I believe that for citizen to have real security and real prosperity, the best strategy is for citizens to actively and peacefully resolve any challenges. For example, but not limited to, do your own research, listen to various opinion. Then make your own opinion. They make life choices based on YOUR own research. NOT on someone else research.
One of the core speculation of Devolution is that citizen should be apathetic and inactive. So that speculated "laws" will solve their life challenge. I believe the opposite. Thus, I do not support Devolution.
Interesting. How else can you unwind the deep institutions that have enslaved us?
crickets
It looks like a Chinese bot. Trying to see if it would respond.
This is the most moronic take on Devolution I've ever seen. Devolution is the most accurately laid out tenet in our entire movement. Guaranteed you believe in flat Earth. 100%, I'd bet the farm on it.
Healthy debate around Devolution theory needs to continue .
IMO there are red flags, not just in the theory but in the backgrounds of those who created it.
I don’t think that is up to us