An Ivermectin Influencer Died. Now His Followers Are Worried About Their Own 'Severe' Symptoms.
(www.vice.com)
🤢 MSM SCUMBAGS 🤢
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (86)
sorted by:
Again your not fully understanding. I made two separate posts in response to your post.
You wrote:
Fren you're killing me. Do you not understand basic English?
You're running your Ivermectin defense programming and failing to read what I'm writing.
I responded with:
What did he die of? Like the actual cause of death diagnosis assigned to him by a coroner?
The "quotes from the telegram channel" are all just that quotes of who? without even a screenshot to show that those messages were actually in the channel, and no proof that they were legitimate posts made by concerned people in the channel.
I then posted a separate response 3 minutes later:
I guess the better question is why do you believe something written by a leftoid from Vice?
I mean just look at this guys line up...
https://www.vice.com/en/contributor/david-gilbert
Which leaves us now in this thread, and your just not catching up to the fact that I answered your question regarding conjecture directly and not as some spin off to you continuing to be clueless as to the conversation you started
I agree those parts of the article are conjecture.
Now, I'll offer the parts I believe are not conjecture and you tell me where we're at with respect to your definition of the word "all":
https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy8xZTBhZDg0L3BvZGNhc3QvcnNz/episode/NzUyYWYxZWMtN2U0ZC00NWJlLWE2NmYtZjM3YTBhMzVhMjJh?ep=14
Danny Lemoi had Lyme Disease (and a pile of other critical health issues).
Danny Lemoi took Ivermectin like a fiend.
Danny Lemoi survived for ten years while taking Ivermectin.
The Telegram channel posted that he died of an enlarged heart and his death was marked as being from natural causes.
Fair enough on the word "all". But like I tell my kids, dont be a drama queen and stretch for meaning where it does not exist.
With facts and conjecture now agreeably separated, what is your take on this article and how it fits in the information war?
How do you figure I'm stretching for meaning?
It still reads like a gay hit piece designed to discourage use of IVM, written by a 2 bit biased idiot working for a 2 bit biased publisher.
Your seemingly reading deeper into the articles intentions. Its surface only intent is to dissuade its regular readers from using IVM.