An Ivermectin Influencer Died. Now His Followers Are Worried About Their Own 'Severe' Symptoms.
(www.vice.com)
🤢 MSM SCUMBAGS 🤢
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (86)
sorted by:
We're worlds apart if you think you're reading "scientific papers". I've read thousands of pseudo-scientific papers - almost never seen an actual scientific paper. The overwhelming majority are filled with poppycock, hogwash and insanity.
I'll bet you can't produce a single one that is a truly "scientific paper" that follows the actual scientific method. Not a one. I can assure you none exist in the realm of "germ theory", ala "contagion" experiments with boogeyman-viruses/bacteria/fungi.
Because our feces is filled with toxins and waste. Has nothing to do with parasites.
Can you produce one that follows the scientific method? It needs to state an hypothesis, define an independent variable and perform control experiments that attempt to disprove the hypothesis. No "injections" allowed either.
If it doesn't include these 3 things, clearly stated, outlined and demonstrated in the "Methods" section of the paper, then it ain't a "scientific paper". It's a pseudo-scientific paper by definition. Which is 100% of the "germ theory" papers.
And said experiment should have been repeated many times by different experimenters as well to verify its validity in order to qualify as irrefutable. The stories of researchers trying to make a name for themselves by falsifying data to produce a result to gain attention, notoriety, money and grants are legion.
I'm all for "science". Unfortunately, almost nobody has been doing any real science in the "soft science" realm for well over 100 years now. And of course, it's never been done in the fraudulent field of "germ theory". Why? Because all the SCIENCE failed miserably to prove pathogenicity and contagion 100+ years ago. Koch's Postulates = 100% failure rate!!
Is it any wonder? Ghislane Maxwell's dad, Robert Maxwell, cornered the entire scientific and medical publishing industry 70-odd years ago (Elsevier), in addition to his near-monopoly on British tabloid newspapers ta boot!!! If you think his goal was to ensure truth, honesty, integrity and the best for humanity, I've got some very bad news for you....
I bet you spent a lot of time writing all that, just to have me blow it off.
You say I can't produce "one" and also say 100%. Both are totally wrong. But I'm not going to bother any more.
BTW, there are more medical publishers besides Elsevier. I have e-book versions of thousands of books by other publishers, such as Springer, Oxford University, Cambridge, and more. There are a lot of major tech publishers, such as Wiley. I have thousands of e-books just by Wiley.
You try to put words in my mouth, which I will not put up with, so don't bother wasting your time writing drivel.