Yeah. Misuse of "it's" instead of "its" could be either historical artifact meaning "itself" or it could be an indicator of a non English speaker composing this document.
I am investigating the etymology to see if this might be proper historical use.
Some weird 18th century language usage here. "except" may have a commerce meaning along the lines of "out from" as a kinda opposite direction of incept "in to".
Seems suspect to me. Would a document like this improperly use “it’s” instead of “its” repeatedly? Looks very bogus.
Agreed. Need some sauce. Extra sauce on the side. Link to prior post that may have anon digs/sauce.
Yeah. Misuse of "it's" instead of "its" could be either historical artifact meaning "itself" or it could be an indicator of a non English speaker composing this document.
I am investigating the etymology to see if this might be proper historical use.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/it's
You are right about the historical use of the apostrophe friend.
It also has "excepts and/or exchanges in United States Currency".
Is the word excepts supposed to be accepts? Or is excepts some legalese I am unaware of?
Some weird 18th century language usage here. "except" may have a commerce meaning along the lines of "out from" as a kinda opposite direction of incept "in to".
And "excepts" instead of "accepts"?
Doh, should have read one post further before hitting reply.