Bigger Than Dobbs v. Jackson?!? SCOTUS UNANIMOUS Ruling In Shurtleff Vs. City Of Boston Has Far - Reaching Effects
(pjmedia.com)
- N C S W I C -
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (10)
sorted by:
eh ... re-store means to put in store anew, leading to the logical conclusion that before the re-store it must have been in store but gone out of store.
However, the suggestion that rights need restoring is not correct. Laws do not give you your rights. Your rights never can be sold, alienated.
What can happen, is that men can be programmed to think otherwise, or bow to the prevailing wind under the guise of ruthless men with an agenda of power grabs.