Came to say the same: he trapped them, they had to confirm on each step the thing is safe, the thing is effective, production is consistent (all batches work the same) -- AND they gave up their legal shield!!! Then they lied on each next step, on each invoice; the batches are clearly different; and there is no legal immunity for them. Looks like down they go, and nothing can stop that.
Karen Kingston is a biotech analyst and former Pfizer employee who understands complicated medical and biological contracts. Kingston has been doing a deep dive into the contract President Trump signed with Pfizer for their version of the CV19 vax. The contract proves Trump required Pfizer to follow the law to produce a safe and effective vaccine. The Pfizer vax was not safe or effective and violated the contract. On top of that, the Pfizer vax turned out to be a bioweapon. Pfizer says it produced 63% of the 13 billion injections worldwide. Kingston explains, “Unlike any other contract I have ever read before, the contract says right up front the President said they had to produce a safe and effective vaccine, and they would have to promise it would protect against SARS-Cov-2 infections and all its variants. Oh, and by the way, all those Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) laws that give you immunity under Obama and Bush, Jr., you are going to forfeit those. . . . Trump said he wanted it by October 31, and the vaccine must be safe and effective. This was not safe and effective under the emergency use vaccine even though it was going to be EUA authorized. They cite the FDA laws under initial new drug applications that it must adhere to. In fact, Pfizer had to adhere to initial new drug application laws that were separate from EUA laws. On top of that, it had to be guaranteed to be safe and effective. . . . The contract that Trump had Pfizer sign made them guarantee this was safe and effective. So, they broke the contract, and Pfizer is not protected under the EUA law. . . . The way the contract is written, it looks to me, Trump said if we need a vaccine to reopen the country, you have to make sure it was safe and effective. . . . The phrase is in there over a dozen times. There is no gray area that the product (Pfizer CV19 vax) had to be safe and effective.”
The bioweapon/vax is research that has been under development for a couple of decades. Kingston contends, “Even Bobby Kennedy said the last 20 years of Fauci (NIH) and Ralph Baric (UNC) research was bioweapon research. Bioweapon research is based in mRNA technology. So, anyone working on mRNA technology under the guise of vaccines and gene therapy was really working on a bioweapon. This is exactly what Lt. General Kirillov, who heads up Russia’s bioweapon program, stated that this is what mRNA technology is. He said they are artificial viruses . . . pathogens based in mRNA technology. Basically, they are technology pathogens. They are meant to cause disease, disabilities and death in humans. They have developed this under the guise of vaccines. . .”
Kingston has been trying to get the leaders around the country and in Congress to stop ignoring the extreme death and disabilities caused by the CV19 bioweapon/vax.
Kingston explains, “Unlike any other contract I have ever read before, the contract says right up front the President said they had to produce a safe and effective vaccine, and they would have to promise it would protect against SARS-Cov-2 infections and all its variants. Oh, and by the way, all those Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) laws that give you immunity under Obama and Bush, Jr., you are going to forfeit those. . . . Trump said he wanted it by October 31, and the vaccine must be safe and effective. This was not safe and effective under the emergency use vaccine even though it was going to be EUA authorized.
Was this the reason Trump stated "The vaccine is safe & effective!"? To point out that they have to produce them according the contract, but didn't?
Misprision of treason is an offense under U.S. federal law which involves the concealment or failure to disclose all pertinent facts to proper authorities when a person has knowledge of the commission of a crime, resulting in fines not more than one thousand dollars and imprisonment at hard labor for not more than ten years.
It is evident that Trump thought the vaccine was safe or he is not the person we think he is! You can say it was the only way and he had no choice but we always have a choice when it comes to god and evil. I think he thought it was safe!
This seem huge. Trump did it again, he set the trap
Good point
Did the company have the choice to do right or wrong? It was their choice to violate the terms.
You have it backwards. They violated without telling anyone....
Came to say the same: he trapped them, they had to confirm on each step the thing is safe, the thing is effective, production is consistent (all batches work the same) -- AND they gave up their legal shield!!! Then they lied on each next step, on each invoice; the batches are clearly different; and there is no legal immunity for them. Looks like down they go, and nothing can stop that.
GREG HUNTER USA Watchdog/KAREN KINGSTON- TRUMP CV19 VAX CONTRACT VIOLATED BY PFIZER
https://rumble.com/v2dqqk8-trump-cv19-vax-contract-violated-by-pfizer-karen-kingston.html
https://usawatchdog.com/
Karen Kingston is a biotech analyst and former Pfizer employee who understands complicated medical and biological contracts. Kingston has been doing a deep dive into the contract President Trump signed with Pfizer for their version of the CV19 vax. The contract proves Trump required Pfizer to follow the law to produce a safe and effective vaccine. The Pfizer vax was not safe or effective and violated the contract. On top of that, the Pfizer vax turned out to be a bioweapon. Pfizer says it produced 63% of the 13 billion injections worldwide. Kingston explains, “Unlike any other contract I have ever read before, the contract says right up front the President said they had to produce a safe and effective vaccine, and they would have to promise it would protect against SARS-Cov-2 infections and all its variants. Oh, and by the way, all those Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) laws that give you immunity under Obama and Bush, Jr., you are going to forfeit those. . . . Trump said he wanted it by October 31, and the vaccine must be safe and effective. This was not safe and effective under the emergency use vaccine even though it was going to be EUA authorized. They cite the FDA laws under initial new drug applications that it must adhere to. In fact, Pfizer had to adhere to initial new drug application laws that were separate from EUA laws. On top of that, it had to be guaranteed to be safe and effective. . . . The contract that Trump had Pfizer sign made them guarantee this was safe and effective. So, they broke the contract, and Pfizer is not protected under the EUA law. . . . The way the contract is written, it looks to me, Trump said if we need a vaccine to reopen the country, you have to make sure it was safe and effective. . . . The phrase is in there over a dozen times. There is no gray area that the product (Pfizer CV19 vax) had to be safe and effective.”
The bioweapon/vax is research that has been under development for a couple of decades. Kingston contends, “Even Bobby Kennedy said the last 20 years of Fauci (NIH) and Ralph Baric (UNC) research was bioweapon research. Bioweapon research is based in mRNA technology. So, anyone working on mRNA technology under the guise of vaccines and gene therapy was really working on a bioweapon. This is exactly what Lt. General Kirillov, who heads up Russia’s bioweapon program, stated that this is what mRNA technology is. He said they are artificial viruses . . . pathogens based in mRNA technology. Basically, they are technology pathogens. They are meant to cause disease, disabilities and death in humans. They have developed this under the guise of vaccines. . .”
Kingston has been trying to get the leaders around the country and in Congress to stop ignoring the extreme death and disabilities caused by the CV19 bioweapon/vax.
Was this the reason Trump stated "The vaccine is safe & effective!"? To point out that they have to produce them according the contract, but didn't?
How does "Misprision of Treason" play into this?
Play dumb as a defense?
Misprision of treason is an offense under U.S. federal law which involves the concealment or failure to disclose all pertinent facts to proper authorities when a person has knowledge of the commission of a crime, resulting in fines not more than one thousand dollars and imprisonment at hard labor for not more than ten years.
It is evident that Trump thought the vaccine was safe or he is not the person we think he is! You can say it was the only way and he had no choice but we always have a choice when it comes to god and evil. I think he thought it was safe!