They say x, ask for where they heard about x. They say from y news organization, ask the source for y. If they say z, if z is actually an actual document or otherwise, ask them where in z does y claim x is true.
If z is just another news organization, keep going until they provide (or don't provide) an actual document. If they can't procure an actual document, send it yourself. If z is just another video cIip, ask them for the whole video. Provide them the entire video if they can't.
Do not try to antagonize. Just simply ask the questions as if you were trying to understand their point of view, to learn something we might not have heard.
you mentioned the 4-6% and I agree it sounds too low compared to what we see. I wonder if 4-6 could mean 40-60? Is there a math rule that we're missing? many gnostics believed 1/3 of population to be empty/hylics, 1/3 are 'psychics' have the potential to awaken, and 1/3 'pneumatics' have a direct God connection.
if they have 'potential' we'd have to try to help, so 2/3 would be able to 'awaken' with a lot of work on Q's part 🤔
I would guess the number is based on statistics - 2 standard deviations from the mean, which is around 95%.