I think Scenario 2 is in play. Trump may allow Deep State to do electoral college rigging in 4-way 2024 election (similar to 1824), but then win in landslide in 2028 under MAGA Party banner.
SCENARIO 1 [2013 to 2029]
We are very likely in Year 10 of overall op (fr 2013) and in Year 6 of public op (fr 2017). Six more years is NOT unreasonable additional plan length [16 year counterplan].
SCENARIO 2 [2013 to 2033]
If the 2024 election gets stolen similarly to 1824, then it may be 16 years from 2017. In this case Trump’s second public term would start on Jan20 or Mar4 2029 and go to 2033 mirroring Andrew Jackson’s first term 200 years ago. With Trump holding C-I-C role from 2021-2029.
SCENARIO 2+ [2013 to 2037]
If Trump gets 4 more years in 2033 due to Deep State interference 2017-2021 (or Reconstitution), then he would get another term 2033-2037, matching Jackson’s second term, and making Trump effectively POTUS for 20 years.
Don’t hate me datefaggers because I’m one of you as well.
76 is not very old if 120 is natural human lifespan. We may have been misled about “aging”. Interesting to note that average lifespan for elites dying of “natural causes” is 95 years while general pop (man) is 75 years.
Trump won’t be able to run after 2024, he will be to old. The country will have already been flushed down the toilet by then and streaming down the sewer system.
Noted. And I generally agree that when the globalists accelerate their plans, there is very likely acceleration to the counter. So it may be scenario 1 is currently playing out but scenario 2 is being prepped for at the same time.
Sorry. Our revolution was complete bullshit as the very first revenue act passed by Congress and signed into law was Hamilton's excise tax on whiskey which was intended to weaken the rural areas of which Hamilton despised.
It wasn't just the tax that was ruinous but the stationing of federal agents in Pennsylvanian to enforce the law no one wanted.. The 4th Amendment was violated incredibly quickly and our courts were not concerned.
But Washington wasn't. He rounded up 12,000 eastern troops and invaded Pennsylvania, to enforce a tax law that was far far more punitive than any tax the British levied.
After the Whiskey Rebellion was over, Hamilton wanted the resistors executed.
Surprisingly, that was one ordered given by Hamilton that the leashed Washington didn't follow.
This country is fantastic at spouted high ideals but only as a tool to enforce tyranny.
Washington was actually an asshole. The city that is named after him is a title earned.
Taxes needed to be raised to pay for the war-debt. Hence, the change from the articles of confederation to Constitution for the U.S.A.
Interesting tidbit on Hamilton being the pusher of the Whiskey tax.
The peace treaty of 1789 contains that particular phrase: yeah, yeah, yeah, all nice that reconciliation and commerce, but eh ... pay the debt first.
As was noted in the movie: Once upon a time in the West:
Debt is a weapon too. And the fledgling US had a lot of it. See, the 1581 rebellion against the Spanish by the Dutch, left one item untouched: debt by the rebels, and instead it was the Spanish who were debt-laden. And just as much the Founding fathers were avid students of History, so too was the UK, bent on not making that Spanish mistake.
So, since 1648: comprehend the debt situation, comprehend history.
Also see the 1814/1815 congress of Vienna vs the Rothschild coup.
Interesting.
The states had the revolutionary war debt. And all they had to do was ratify the constitution and the federal government - which had exactly $0 - would pay it all off.
This is troubling as this fact is never mentioned, yet the Constitution would not have been ratified but for the promise of "eliminating" states' revolutionary war debt by shifting to the federal balance sheet/
There was no actual revolution. Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss.
I agree. Constitution never would have been ratified if debt had been wiped. Optimistic founders may have assumed it could be paid in 70 years with individual property rights established. And they were on this track with elimination of Central Bank 2 in 1836, and that is why the Civil War was ginned up to create more debt and sabotage the Bill of Rights, etc., imo.
Freedom cannot and must not succeed.
Ron Paul often asked: why don't we try freedom for a change. Debt is the answer to that question.
This is exactly why the EU wants to eliminate the sovereign debt market for its member states.
Pretty much explains all of history back to at least 1489. It has been THE weapon of control and destruction.
Not all the “Founding Fathers” were nice people for sure. But being nice is not how one defends one’s interests.
Both Hamilton and John Adams were clearly on the British or Banker payroll as well as others yet uncovered (possibly Hancock). The co-opted ones are the ones most celebrated by the MSM like Adams as “great visionary leaders” per the recent big production mini-series. The whole reason Adams was 1 term was because Washington/Jefferson thought that was better than executing him for treason.
Understood there was trickery, but it was a step better than the complete enslavement and genocide that was planned. Globalists had to counter American Revolution by developing Communism, so it took them some time.
Communism is just another form of militaristic mercantilism, or even vice-versa. Enslavement by different labels in order to confuse blatant tyranny.
Understood. Yes. Both sides are controlled, and fusion of communism with corporate control is clearly the modern form of tyranny. Anything centralized is our enemy.