I read the "analysis." Sheer speculation. No genealogical evidence, as I said, and which you do not dispute. All it would take is birth records, but obviously they cannot substantiate this hypothesis or they would be revealed. Yes, "flakey" is the word to use for this imaginative notion. Or do you claim that Anthony Dexter is the son of Rudolf Valentino, simply because they look identical? That is really what this article amounts to: similarity of appearance proves genetic lineage. Really?
Photo analysis is make-believe. What can you prove? Nothing. If there is no genealogy, it is all a fantasy. (You still don't address the idea that Anthony Dexter was the son of Rudolf Valentino. Or is that too much for "photo analysis"?)
I read the "analysis." Sheer speculation. No genealogical evidence, as I said, and which you do not dispute. All it would take is birth records, but obviously they cannot substantiate this hypothesis or they would be revealed. Yes, "flakey" is the word to use for this imaginative notion. Or do you claim that Anthony Dexter is the son of Rudolf Valentino, simply because they look identical? That is really what this article amounts to: similarity of appearance proves genetic lineage. Really?
Are you drunk? You say you read the analysis but still fail to grasp that it said PHOTO ANALYSIS from the very beginning.
"BuT wHeRe Is TeH gEnEaLoGy???"
lol, it's right next to Obama's birth certificate. Holy hell dude.
Photo analysis is make-believe. What can you prove? Nothing. If there is no genealogy, it is all a fantasy. (You still don't address the idea that Anthony Dexter was the son of Rudolf Valentino. Or is that too much for "photo analysis"?)