Veryyyyyyyy Interesting Indeed!
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
The accumulation of damning information under oath has been the goal. Robby Mook's testimony about Hillary but one example. The time will come when the criminals will go to trial. I've a feeling the evidence gathering in these "lost" trials will be spectacularly resurfacing at a later date when it really counts. Wait and see...
I agree that lots of great info got on the record during Durham’s trials. However, since both trials resulted in acquittals, imo this is going to make it harder for Durham in the future to convince normies and juries that people higher up the chain are guilty too. Their smooth-brain logic is going to be “Sussman/Danchenko got acquitted, therefore there’s no crime and Hillary is innocent too!”
This is going to be especially true if future trials continue to be held in DC. When Q said that 4-6% were lost forever, I suspect a good chunk of that consists of people in DC. It’s one of the great strongholds of TDS, no matter what new evidence or what new indictments come.
They don’t care about evidence or logic, they care about “orange man bad”. And unless Durham can find a way around that, he’s going to make just as much progress in the next 5 years as he’s had in the past 5 years.
Obviously some documentation gained is for the public, and some is for future trial evidence....
Durham's and other's accumulated evidence probably won't necessarily be seen in DC when the SHTF for the DS goons. More likely all that stuff will be seen in military trials.
It's all winning, even when the court of law calls it losing. Think mirror. Opposite day. Inverted narratives, alternate realities, armour of magical thinking, by any mystics necessary. NCSWIC