10 year olds near death testimony- Alien Demons đź‘˝
(videopress.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
Sorry, but this is false. The Bible tells us in Heb 9:27 "And as it is appointed for men to die once, but after this the judgment," Nobody visits heaven or hell and comes back. The Apostles and Jesus were able to resurrect people for the purposes of proving they were from God. After the establishment of the Church those miracles ceased. Anyone who claims to have died and gone to heaven or hell and returned are frauds
The real frauds are those who limit the power of God with their words and discredit the work he continues to do through his children.
Your theory is a popular one but Mark 16:17 disproves it, as Jesus himself said that miracles will follow ALL THOSE who believe. Jesus was saying this to the disciples before he left and made sure to specify that he was not talking about them. At one point the disciples had corrected a random (unnamed) man that was healing and casting out demons in the name of Jesus because they knew the guy didn’t live his life alongside him like they did. Jesus corrected them for attempting to keep him from working miracles.
I could keep going, but I believe you should be able to get the point if you open your heart to the Holy Spirit’s leading. He will guide you to truth if you ask..but be sure to put aside any (human) idea of what the limitless power of God is able to accomplish.
The Bible is complete. There is no new revelation. 2 Pet 1:3-4 says, "as His divine power has given to us all things that pertain to life and godliness, through the knowledge of Him who called us by glory and virtue, by which have been given to us exceedingly great and precious promises, that through these you may be partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust."
There seems to be a disconnect, as the verse you’ve quoted is not supporting scripture for your argument. The Bible is complete with the prophecy of Jesus being complete, but “no new revelation” is absolutely unbiblical in the context you’ve used it.
“Most assuredly, I say to you, he who believes in Me, the works that I do he will do also; and greater works than these he will do, because I go to My Father. And whatever you ask in My name, that I will do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son.”â€â€ John‬ â€14‬:â€12‬-â€13‬
“However, when He, the Spirit of truth, has come, He will guide you into all truth; for He will not speak on His own authority, but whatever He hears He will speak; and He will tell you things to come. He will glorify Me, for He will take of what is Mine and declare it to you. All things that the Father has are Mine. Therefore I said that He will take of Mine and declare it to you.” â€â€John‬ â€16‬:â€13‬-â€15‬
I and many other Spirit-filled believers continue to see world-shattering miracles done through us by God, simply because we laid down our ideas of who he is and allow ourselves to be used as we step out in faith. I don’t say this at all to boast (if anything I boast of HIS authority), but to tell you as a brother that he is most definitely at work today.
Jesus said people would do miracles in His name but He didn't know them.
God is limited in the sense of He won't do things that go against His Word. Not limited in power or ability.
What about Lazarus, or Jairus’s daughter? Or Paul bringing Eutychus back to life? And Elijah raised the son of the Zarephath the widow from the dead and that was in the Old Testament.
As I said, miracles were performed by the Apostles and Jesus. After the establishement of the church, miracles ceased. John received the last vision from the Lord and teh cannon was closed. God has giiven us His word. There are no new revelations.
If miracles were only performed by Jesus and the apostles, please explain all the miracles performed in the Old Testament. I think putting God in a box and claiming that He can’t perform miracles today is incorrect and perhaps dangerous dogma.
Maybe... but a cabal that has manipulated EVERYTHING on this land that we live and as we are being told time and again EVERYTHING you know is a lie, how can we believe a book that has been stepped on by man throughout centuries. My point, while what we are being told here may be another lie, that book everyone seems to think is above lies is probably just as corrupt. I would love an answer to why the cabal chose to let us know the truth through 66 books of the bible. Its almost like that number they chose to give us, 66, is a clue as to what they have done to the bible.
What part of the Bible is wrong? If the Bible isn't true what is? Did Jesus die on a cross and was He Burried, and did He rise again to defeat death?
I do not have answers, I only have questions. All of your questions are valid. No one here can answer them with certainty. You have faith these things are true. Or you don't. In trying to look at things logically you have to ask the questions.
One doesn’t have to change God’s word when all you have to do is use a corrupt Pasteur to twist Scripture. Any church that has a BLM or gay flag in front of it should be avoided like the plague.
Broaden your perspective.
The books of the bible came first, perhaps [I'm not sure when the cabal gained its foothold].
All the cabal needed to do afterward to corrupt the bible's perceived divine purpose was to pollute as many things as they could in the minds of men relative to it.
Hence, assigning a satanic meaning to 666.
We need to break their spells and take back all our Holy Gifts.
So you are saying, all the cabal needed to do was change just a few things to throw off the real message? If that is what you are saying then I agree and is pretty much what I meant. Why would they allow us to see the truth, in what is probably the most important book ever....but twist everything else. As far as which came first we are talking thousands of years either way. That is a lot of time to pollute a message. You have to talk to me like a 10 year old. Seriously, I tend to be slow. That book, translated by man, has caused a massive amount of bloodshed through the centuries. Its far too easy to interpret things many different ways. If our creator wanted us to have a book to guide our lives why would he not make it direct and obvious?
So John didnt visit heaven when he describes it in Revelation? Is a vision not a visit? Can you have a vision when dreaming? Whats the difference between a truthful vision and being physically present? Just curious
Yes John did visit heaven in the Spirit. In Rev 1:9-11 "I, John, both your brother and companion in the tribulation and kingdom and patience of Jesus Christ, was on the island that is called Patmos for the word of God and for the testimony of Jesus Christ. I was in the Spirit on the Lord’s Day, and I heard behind me a loud voice, as of a trumpet, saying, “I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last,” and, “What you see, write in a book and send it to the seven churches [h]which are in Asia: to Ephesus, to Smyrna, to Pergamos, to Thyatira, to Sardis, to Philadelphia, and to Laodicea.” John was the last person to receive visions from the Lord.
The Apostle Paul speaks of himself when he says, in 2 Cor 12:2-3 "I know a man in Christ who fourteen years ago—whether in the body I do not know, or whether out of the body I do not know, God knows—such a one was caught up to the third heaven. 3 And I know such a man—whether in the body or out of the body I do not know, God knows—"