I didn't post a link to the wayback machine before, but here is one. Not sure how to "show you", other than giving a link and having you read it, so.... 🤷♀️
That's not the wayback machine, and I never claimed it was the same article.
It's not even the same website.
I was using that to show people that Durham was saying that it was a conspiracy a year ago, because it says it right in the headline.
I can't trust that anyone here will go to all the effort of actually reading the entire article. I have to make it as simple as possible and spoon feed it to people.
But apparently that backfired, seeing as how you didn't even bother to check if it was the same news source, or author, or article, or anything.
🤦♀️
JFC, I really don't know why I even bother sometimes. I really don't.
What exactly do you believe was my "mistaken conclusion"?
Yes, I care that the general population believes all Anons are functionally retarded, because they come here and see shit like this.
I mentioned that I checked the Wayback machine and it was the same. I never said I gave a link to it. And it's possible to carry on more than one conversation at once. I can speak of the Wayback Machine in one post, and post a link to something else in another.
You don't even know what the wayback machine is, otherwise you wouldn't have confused a completely 100% different website, that was clearly not the Wayback machine as the Wayback machine.
Goddamn! Seriously! Are you fuckers trying to discredit Q and every other Anon?
I didn't post a link to the wayback machine before, but here is one. Not sure how to "show you", other than giving a link and having you read it, so.... 🤷♀️
https://web.archive.org/web/20220430054444/https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/durham-bombshell-fbi-text-message-shows-clinton-lawyer
That link was what that article looked like on April 30, 2022. Looks exactly the same to me. So, again.....🤷♀️
Edited to add:
But just to Scooby-Doo this shit, why exactly are you thinking those paragraphs are new?
The link you posted twice, and referenced to in your previous posts;
https://www.thefreedomtimes.com/2022/04/05/new-durham-filing-reveals-text-message-from-sussman-joint-venture-or-conspiracy-to-smear-trump/
Did not include those six paragraphs.
Perhaps the reason for your initial confusion?
That's not the wayback machine, and I never claimed it was the same article.
It's not even the same website.
I was using that to show people that Durham was saying that it was a conspiracy a year ago, because it says it right in the headline.
I can't trust that anyone here will go to all the effort of actually reading the entire article. I have to make it as simple as possible and spoon feed it to people.
But apparently that backfired, seeing as how you didn't even bother to check if it was the same news source, or author, or article, or anything.
🤦♀️
JFC, I really don't know why I even bother sometimes. I really don't.
So, you decided to reference an article where you came to a mistaken conclusion. Now you state that you did that because you 'care'.
That's funny, you're quite adept at covering your mistakes. I will give you credit for that.
Why did I mention '"Wayback" in my previous post?
You're welcome.
WTF are you talking about?
What exactly do you believe was my "mistaken conclusion"?
Yes, I care that the general population believes all Anons are functionally retarded, because they come here and see shit like this.
I mentioned that I checked the Wayback machine and it was the same. I never said I gave a link to it. And it's possible to carry on more than one conversation at once. I can speak of the Wayback Machine in one post, and post a link to something else in another.
You don't even know what the wayback machine is, otherwise you wouldn't have confused a completely 100% different website, that was clearly not the Wayback machine as the Wayback machine.
Goddamn! Seriously! Are you fuckers trying to discredit Q and every other Anon?