I don't know if you're old enough to remember the news about Paul's putative death. I remember it quite well. My sister was an avid Beatles fan. Upon hearing the news, she locked herself in her bedroom and refused to come out. I sold a VJ label "Introducing the Beatles" album to a friend for $150 in 1972. At today's price, this rare label is probably 10X the amount.
Not too long ago, an Italian forensic facial reconstruction analysis team known for their work with the police in identifying human remains all through Europe were put up to the task to end this 'rumor' once and for all concerning Paul McCartney being replaced by someone else. Their work of piecing together all the photos prior to 1966 and after 1966 resulted in a shocking affirmation that the later Paul was indeed not the same Paul McCartney prior to 1966. This was publicized worldwide and I recall reading about it. Shortly later, a certain surprise guest showed up on the David Letterman show to personally discredit the finding. It was Paul McCartney. I was't a believer then, but it certainly changed my view on the possibility....... It's a valid argument.
The nose bridge is different too..... along with many other anomalies.
Interesting! I will show my mom and her friends who are fans.
I don't know if you're old enough to remember the news about Paul's putative death. I remember it quite well. My sister was an avid Beatles fan. Upon hearing the news, she locked herself in her bedroom and refused to come out. I sold a VJ label "Introducing the Beatles" album to a friend for $150 in 1972. At today's price, this rare label is probably 10X the amount.
Not too long ago, an Italian forensic facial
reconstructionanalysis team known for their work with the police in identifying human remains all through Europe were put up to the task to end this 'rumor' once and for all concerning Paul McCartney being replaced by someone else. Their work of piecing together all the photos prior to 1966 and after 1966 resulted in a shocking affirmation that the later Paul was indeed not the same Paul McCartney prior to 1966. This was publicized worldwide and I recall reading about it. Shortly later, a certain surprise guest showed up on the David Letterman show to personally discredit the finding. It was Paul McCartney. I was't a believer then, but it certainly changed my view on the possibility....... It's a valid argument.Interesting! I did not know that about the facial reconstruction.
I detect some sarcasm here. Perhaps "analysis" instead should be used. I edited my reply.