Yeah, I saw a video about this years ago...don't know if it is the same one..it certainly is possible and with all the lies we have been told...it is very probable...it is an interesting story...
I actually learned about this in music class when I was in 5th or 6th grade. {Teacher didn't believe it, but still offered it as a theory....imagine that!}
All kind of hints to it being legit from the other band members and media.
Dumb theory. But even if true, the new Paul is still the Paul who wrote and sang Yesterday, Blackbird, Let It Be, Hey Jude, Live and Let Die, etc etc. So still a pretty good Paul...maybe better than the original Paul.
Right Faul is the one I know and love but that’s a mind fuck. It shows how powerfuly good the DS is at deception. If this is true, I’d believe any double/clone theory thrown out there
Mike Williams has been the most thorough investigator on the Beatles psy op. The "Paul is dead" part is, to me, besides the point. Their Tavistock origins, and Lennon's later horror of finally being convinced he was a pawn, are more important culturally speaking.
I grew up with the Beatles and Paul was my favorite. I remember the rumors in 66 that he had died. And how they changed after that with Sgt Pepper's Band Album.
People from Liverpool have a sense of humour that runs right up to the edge and often goes over it. Would the Beatles have decided to play up to these story's?
I don't know of course but i wouldn't be surprised.
I watched the "documentary" about this, and its fucking horseshit. The justification of 'replacing' McCartney while then threatening the band with having a 'rabid fan' kill them for not keeping the secret is contradictory on the level of current wokie nonsense.
I don't know if you're old enough to remember the news about Paul's putative death. I remember it quite well. My sister was an avid Beatles fan. Upon hearing the news, she locked herself in her bedroom and refused to come out. I sold a VJ label "Introducing the Beatles" album to a friend for $150 in 1972. At today's price, this rare label is probably 10X the amount.
Not too long ago, an Italian forensic facial reconstruction analysis team known for their work with the police in identifying human remains all through Europe were put up to the task to end this 'rumor' once and for all concerning Paul McCartney being replaced by someone else. Their work of piecing together all the photos prior to 1966 and after 1966 resulted in a shocking affirmation that the later Paul was indeed not the same Paul McCartney prior to 1966. This was publicized worldwide and I recall reading about it. Shortly later, a certain surprise guest showed up on the David Letterman show to personally discredit the finding. It was Paul McCartney. I was't a believer then, but it certainly changed my view on the possibility....... It's a valid argument.
Saw a video of Paul visiting his childhood home where the beatles started. It looked like he realy reminisced about the event. Will Billy have acted differently.
If he replaced Paul, he must have the same exact DNA for his daughters Mary and Beatrice to look EXACTLY like him when he was a child. The eyebrows do not lie. Absolutely the same arch in each eyebrow, which are very different from each other. One brow arches higher.
Has anyone noticed that many of the other theories that get posted here are as follows: everyone living is actually dead and those are body doubles, as well as, everyone dead is actually alive and part of the plan.
Yeah, I saw a video about this years ago...don't know if it is the same one..it certainly is possible and with all the lies we have been told...it is very probable...it is an interesting story...
I actually learned about this in music class when I was in 5th or 6th grade. {Teacher didn't believe it, but still offered it as a theory....imagine that!}
All kind of hints to it being legit from the other band members and media.
Dumb theory. But even if true, the new Paul is still the Paul who wrote and sang Yesterday, Blackbird, Let It Be, Hey Jude, Live and Let Die, etc etc. So still a pretty good Paul...maybe better than the original Paul.
Right Faul is the one I know and love but that’s a mind fuck. It shows how powerfuly good the DS is at deception. If this is true, I’d believe any double/clone theory thrown out there
"The one and only Billy Shears - cu-cu-ka-cu I am the Walrus."
Mike Williams has been the most thorough investigator on the Beatles psy op. The "Paul is dead" part is, to me, besides the point. Their Tavistock origins, and Lennon's later horror of finally being convinced he was a pawn, are more important culturally speaking.
recent interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qupgav_RvMU
Mike's channel https://www.bitchute.com/channel/mK8GIZDrL8lV/
Faul Mc Carney
I went through it all with an open mind and realized it is a ridiculous lie. No one is that similar to anyone else except for an identical twin.
There is a twin theory about that.
HELP!
Do you want to know a Secret?
Paul McCartney is Twins
http://mileswmathis.com/paul8.pdf
He says no way they aren't twins but I don't see that at all. 18 months difference seems reasonable.
I e always wondered if this one was true or not but every one calling him Billy….whoa.
Get a clue, at the time everybody knew-
it was the body double in the crash.
I grew up with the Beatles and Paul was my favorite. I remember the rumors in 66 that he had died. And how they changed after that with Sgt Pepper's Band Album.
By now every public image has been digitally altered. Huge psyop.
In addition, original Paul had a delicate, more heart-shaped face.
Faux Paul has a distinctively elongated oblong face.
I saw Sir Paul on SNL explain to Chris Farley that it was a hoax, and that he was not really dead.
In that question I love how Farley pronounces “hoax”
So Wisconsinian ;)
People from Liverpool have a sense of humour that runs right up to the edge and often goes over it. Would the Beatles have decided to play up to these story's? I don't know of course but i wouldn't be surprised.
I watched the "documentary" about this, and its fucking horseshit. The justification of 'replacing' McCartney while then threatening the band with having a 'rabid fan' kill them for not keeping the secret is contradictory on the level of current wokie nonsense.
Lennon came out , would have been a few years after this they took him out. https://youtu.be/DDf3vcvaRw4
Jimmy Saville
"A Day in the Life."
I 💯% believe the original died in 1966. Compare the shape of their eyes and you will see (pun intended).
The nose bridge is different too..... along with many other anomalies.
Interesting! I will show my mom and her friends who are fans.
I don't know if you're old enough to remember the news about Paul's putative death. I remember it quite well. My sister was an avid Beatles fan. Upon hearing the news, she locked herself in her bedroom and refused to come out. I sold a VJ label "Introducing the Beatles" album to a friend for $150 in 1972. At today's price, this rare label is probably 10X the amount.
Not too long ago, an Italian forensic facial
reconstructionanalysis team known for their work with the police in identifying human remains all through Europe were put up to the task to end this 'rumor' once and for all concerning Paul McCartney being replaced by someone else. Their work of piecing together all the photos prior to 1966 and after 1966 resulted in a shocking affirmation that the later Paul was indeed not the same Paul McCartney prior to 1966. This was publicized worldwide and I recall reading about it. Shortly later, a certain surprise guest showed up on the David Letterman show to personally discredit the finding. It was Paul McCartney. I was't a believer then, but it certainly changed my view on the possibility....... It's a valid argument.Interesting! I did not know that about the facial reconstruction.
I detect some sarcasm here. Perhaps "analysis" instead should be used. I edited my reply.
Saw a video of Paul visiting his childhood home where the beatles started. It looked like he realy reminisced about the event. Will Billy have acted differently.
So many downvotes going on on this topic 👀 🤔
Bad link but here is one that should work ...
https://www.quora.com/Did-the-real-Paul-McCartney-of-the-Beatles-die-in-a-car-crash-in-1966
If he replaced Paul, he must have the same exact DNA for his daughters Mary and Beatrice to look EXACTLY like him when he was a child. The eyebrows do not lie. Absolutely the same arch in each eyebrow, which are very different from each other. One brow arches higher.
Has anyone noticed that many of the other theories that get posted here are as follows: everyone living is actually dead and those are body doubles, as well as, everyone dead is actually alive and part of the plan.
"I am the walrus" listen carefully. He died in a van and the singer states he is me as I am her and we are all together