I counted at least 4 5.56 mm rounds from the carbine and another 4 from the pistol, probably 9mm. 5.56 at that range isn't stabilized on its axis and is still yawing and pitching. The bullet strikes at an off angle and tumbles within the body. Add hollowpoints, ballistic tips or softpoints and the wound channel becomes quite large (approx 8-10 inches in diameter). The pistol doesn't have the same amount of kinetic energy and are undoubtedly hollowpoints. Federal HST, Speer Gold Dots, Remington Golden Sabers or some equivalent. These are specifically designed not to overpenetrate and deposit all their kinetic energy within the body of the perpetrator. As far as blood, I have seen what looks like a horror movie and I have seen others with virtually no blood apparent, however I have never seen multiple gunshots from both a carbine and a pistol that doesn't show traumatic entry wounds with blood coming out. The first rounds can be relatively blood free, however subsequent shots tend to cause hydrostatic pressure that causes blood to come out of the initial entry wounds because the wound cavities fill with blood.
Thanks for that, I haven't spent hardly any time looking at the film if I'm honest, as I'm taking a break from digging.
Yes indeed, we used to use 7.62mm rounds which would usually exit pretty much anything, even at distance, so the move over to 5.56mm rounds was for exactly what you said, more damage inside the body as the round tumbles.
Maybe if my mood changes I will take a closer look, but right now I need a break.
Or pegged from a sniper/police outside, whom she was firing at. Although the officers inside began rushing upstairs toward the shots when they located it’s position. But, that window silhouette woulda been an easy shot.
Where are the holes and blood?
Just to throw this out there...
It would appear she was shot in the back (looking out the window?), given the way she landed face up.
Unless it was a head shot (then there would be blood/splatter on the clothing) there appears to be no exit hole.
Anyone know what weapon took it down, allegedly?
I counted at least 4 5.56 mm rounds from the carbine and another 4 from the pistol, probably 9mm. 5.56 at that range isn't stabilized on its axis and is still yawing and pitching. The bullet strikes at an off angle and tumbles within the body. Add hollowpoints, ballistic tips or softpoints and the wound channel becomes quite large (approx 8-10 inches in diameter). The pistol doesn't have the same amount of kinetic energy and are undoubtedly hollowpoints. Federal HST, Speer Gold Dots, Remington Golden Sabers or some equivalent. These are specifically designed not to overpenetrate and deposit all their kinetic energy within the body of the perpetrator. As far as blood, I have seen what looks like a horror movie and I have seen others with virtually no blood apparent, however I have never seen multiple gunshots from both a carbine and a pistol that doesn't show traumatic entry wounds with blood coming out. The first rounds can be relatively blood free, however subsequent shots tend to cause hydrostatic pressure that causes blood to come out of the initial entry wounds because the wound cavities fill with blood.
Thanks for that, I haven't spent hardly any time looking at the film if I'm honest, as I'm taking a break from digging.
Yes indeed, we used to use 7.62mm rounds which would usually exit pretty much anything, even at distance, so the move over to 5.56mm rounds was for exactly what you said, more damage inside the body as the round tumbles.
Maybe if my mood changes I will take a closer look, but right now I need a break.
Or pegged from a sniper/police outside, whom she was firing at. Although the officers inside began rushing upstairs toward the shots when they located it’s position. But, that window silhouette woulda been an easy shot.