Literally first thing any basic Q detective or anyone w the Q link at this point is going to do is searched Q posts for INDICATED because it’s an inserted word where another word should be.
So he means to talk about his INDICTMENT
writes INDICATED
which displays Q POST - VINDICATION “TAKE ONE FOR THE TEAM”
IE in order to be VINDICATED he must TAKE A BIG ONE PUBLICLY for the team and be indicted
Does it have to be more 5:5 than that?
And it very well could have numerous reasons, yet here we have a perfect and reassuring message about his INDICTMENT.
At times people here wanna find clues that aren’t clues at all and miss the very clear ones in search for more cryptic subtle proofs.
Could be both why not?
Literally first thing any basic Q detective or anyone w the Q link at this point is going to do is searched Q posts for INDICATED because it’s an inserted word where another word should be.
So he means to talk about his INDICTMENT
writes INDICATED
which displays Q POST - VINDICATION “TAKE ONE FOR THE TEAM”
IE in order to be VINDICATED he must TAKE A BIG ONE PUBLICLY for the team and be indicted
Does it have to be more 5:5 than that?
And it very well could have numerous reasons, yet here we have a perfect and reassuring message about his INDICTMENT.