Not Q.
WARNO: We are at the most dangerous point in our lifetimes, domestically, and specifically as a victim of crime. For those of you that carry, I URGE you to get carry insurance.
For about 15.00/mo you can have a near unlimited and defense team in the case of a defensive use of a firearm. I've already had a confront ation in the last year - no discharge.
The leftists have infiltrated a vast majority of the judicial system and you will face immense legal attacks and lawyer bills plus related charges. Don't care who, they are all good. Do your research. Carry on.
You know why I don’t have carry insurance? Use of force continuum. Learn it, memorize it, live by it. To all my former Beat cops and MP’s you know what I’m talking about.
Semper Fi
I was in fear of my life. I was in fear of losing the life of a loved one. I was in fear of losing the life of an innocent bistander. I used my weapon to protect myself and others and discharged my firearm to stop the threat. (not to kill/destroy)
Remember to double tap and reassess.
Doesn’t matter if you do everything perfectly. You may still have to go to court for criminal and then civil suits and that takes time and money. The other side will have a reason to put you in court, so it isn’t just that simple…
From Wiki: A use of force continuum is a standard that provides law enforcement officers and civilians with guidelines as to how much force may be used against a resisting subject in a given situation. In some ways, it is similar to the U.S. military's escalation of force (EOF). The purpose of these models is to clarify, both for law enforcement officers and civilians, the complex subject of use of force. They are often central parts of law enforcement agencies' use of force policies. Various criminal justice agencies have developed different models of the continuum, and there is no universal or standard model. Generally, each different agency will have their own use of force policy. Some agencies may separate some of the hand-to-hand based use of force. For example, take-downs and pressure point techniques may be one step before actual strikes and kicks. Also, for some agencies the use of aerosol pepper spray and electronic control devices (TASER) may fall into the same category as take-downs, or the actual strikes.
The first examples of use of force continuum were developed in the 1890s and early 1900s. Early models were depicted in various formats, including graphs, semicircular "gauges", and linear progressions. Most often the models are presented in "stair step" fashion, with each level of force matched by a corresponding level of subject resistance, although it is generally noted that an officer need not progress through each level before reaching the final level of force. These progressions rest on the premise that officers should escalate and de-escalate their level of force in response to the subject's actions.
Although the use of force continuum is used primarily as a training tool for law enforcement officers, it is also valuable with civilians, such as in criminal trials or hearings by police review boards. In particular, a graphical representation of a use of force continuum is useful to a jury when deciding whether an officer's use of force was reasonable.
That’s the history of use of force continuum. Not a single time does it give a single example lol. Cool story bro
Some states have very good laws concerning self defense.
I don't need insurance in oklahoma.
Oklahoma is one of the freest states. If it wasn’t for the tornadoes…
Question. Is it still illegal to own a copy of the protocols of the elders of Zion there?
I don't thinks so..... and I have insurance against tornados.
Got mine through U.S. Law Shield. Well worth it.
Check USCCA. Pros and cons to them all. They have good education materials and simple state by state reciprocity info.