Hey Pedes, looking for clarity on a theory I'm mentally mulling around. It's kind of wild, but also, could have drastic implications if there is any truth to this.
I'll preface this by saying I am a believer in Christ, and only looking for truth, please don't shoot the messenger, this is an open debate and one I expect to see some heated emotions over.
The Greek word for "ante" is "αντι-", and although the current accepted translation of ἀντίχριστος is Anti-christ, there is little literature to explain the use of Anti vs Ante.
There is a possibility that the word "antichrist" in the Bible has been mistranslated or misunderstood, and that it may actually refer to an "ante-Christ," or a precursor to the coming of Christ, similar to how John the Baptist preceded Jesus. The book of Revelation, a highly symbolic and metaphorical text, may not actually predict a future apocalypse or end times, but rather symbolizes the ongoing struggle between good and evil in human history. According to this theory, the arrival of the "antechrist" figure may not be a negative event, but rather a necessary step in clearing the way for Jesus' return.
Let's analyze Trumps actions in contrast to the antechristos.
Abraham accords - negotiating peace with Isreal, only to turn his back in 3.5 years time. Does this fit with Biden getting into office?
The concept of a peace deal or covenant made by the antichrist is not explicitly mentioned in the book of Revelation, but it is described in some other parts of the Bible, particularly in the book of Daniel. In Daniel 9:27, it says:
"He [the antichrist] will confirm a covenant with many for one 'seven.' In the middle of the 'seven' he will put an end to sacrifice and offering. And at the temple he will set up an abomination that causes desolation, until the end that is decreed is poured out on him."
Is the end of sacrifice, the end of child, human sacrifice to Baal? Or worse? This kind fits to me. Especially considering the Mossad connections with Epstein et al.
in Revelation 13:3, where it says, "And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast." This wound is described as being healed, and as a result, people are amazed and follow the beast.
I've often wondered if Trump gaining the presidency again would fulfill this passage?
There is a lot more to this theory, but it's a lot to type out, I'll leave it at this for now.
There are alternatives to this as well, as Obama/Biden could also fulfill the above prophecy by Biden essentially being an Obama Manchurian candidate. I don't know enough about Obamas political deals with Isreal to make a call on the first one.
One final thing here, Is to look at the way Jesus responded to Caiaphas and the high Jewish court :
You know neither me nor my Father. If you knew me, you would know my Father also."
This is very telling that Jesus did not see YahWeh as his "Father" in heaven. Jesus never once mentioned Yahweh when referencing the father. He used Abba, or other terms.
Thoughts, pedes?
Concerning the high priests, Stephen called out those who worshipped the six pointed star of remphan, Ezekiel 8 shows us who they worship and what they do in secret and revelation calls them out as the deceitful synagogue of satan who claim they are his chosen people but are deceitful name stealing charlatans. John called them out as a den of vipers. Paul called them wolves in sheeps clothing who would come in and take over positions of authority. They are all of the same spirit and the same corruption we’ve been battling with since the beginning, usurpers who claim God but serve the enemy.
My understanding is out Jesus using the term abba instead of his fathers direct name was to stress the importance of relationship. How many times have you called your father by his name? He was always speaking to people who knew exactly who he was referring to.
There is a major red flag with your theories, especially with your view of who yhwh is that brings me to ask one sincere question and that is where did the idea of yhwh just being a warlord tribal alien come from?
Look into Helena Blavatsky and the secret doctrine and then ask yourself why your theory has ideas that are rooted upon theories that are derived from a professed lucifarian?
If you do not know who Helena Blavatsky is, she would be a good place for you to start to begin to see the lies of the new age and how they have by design seeped into modern day Christianity and especially with regards to eschatology and the interpretation of the Bible. If you know about the niv and how it so subtly removes the power from the word you begin to realize how sly the enemy truly is.
“It is the glory of God to conceal a matter, but the glory of Kings to search it out.”
You're making good points, just keep in mind that there were no hexagrams in Judea in the first century, the star of Remphan is a symbol for Saturn, which was not represented by an asterism. TMI on the subject.
Your right, that is interesting, the 6 pointed star doesn’t seem to pop up until much later in history. Which might lead one to conclude that the Star of David has nothing to do with the star of remphan and has nothing to do with astrology and these Babylonian religions but then you begin to find evidence that would make it appear that the leaders of that age were the same kabbalists of the previous age just with a different logo.
Indeed, the cabalists (which include the kabbalists) want to corrupt every symbol. The demons stay the same, the humans are of necessity used up and cycled out, and come from every nation because they know we will rule every nation. We wrestle not with flesh and blood.
Your right, 6 points is my opinion of what Stephen was calling out, both Amos and Stephen call out just a star and don’t specify points, so it then becomes circumstantial evidence to identify what he exactly is referring to. Pictographs of chiun (remphan) if I remember are depicted with different points depending on who when and where but reference the same god. So it then leads to the question of origin of the 6 pointed star Israel had adopted, because it has no historical connection to David, at least not that I’m aware of, and so with the connection of ancient Babylonian religions being practiced by the religious leaders of Israel during that time and the symbol of the 6 pointed star being adopted by this religious ruling class has more circumstantial evidence pointing in the direction of the astral Babylonian cults than it does the lineage and house of David.
Sometimes research from long ago isn’t the sharpest blade when you pull it out to use it 20 years later, that’s why I love this community. My pride isn’t in the way of standing corrected and iron sharpens iron.
Every “fact” in essence is a theory, and circumstantial evidence and conjecture are all we have to go with sometimes. Do we have every detail of every situation to conclude with finite accuracy concerning events being 100 percent factual? Absolutely not. That’s why debate and conversation is essential. And yet circumstantial evidence and conjecture can condemn you to death in a court of law so obviously it has more value than what your implying it does. You should never take what a man says as “fact” but verify it for yourself.
Your correct about the 6 points, it is a detail that isn’t accurate and drowns out the greater context and point being made. The kabbalists are what thread the circumstantial evidence of worshipping stars and Babylonian deities within Judaism both past and present regardless of the amount of points.