The possible fate of Wisconsin in the 2024 election hangs in the balance if Justice Dan Kelly is not voted in. The other Justice on the ticket is a George Soros funded hack, fully on board for abortion and trans nonsense and ready to push it by any means necessary. Election integrity is also in danger, even more so than before, if that Soros funded Justice gets in.
So if you live in or are eligible to vote in Wisconsin, please vote for Justice Dan Kelly no matter what.
LET'S GOOOO!!!
I thought this made sense. People are saying vote no to the first two statewide referendum items. Here's why:
From Dan Eastman
I want to vote on the actual language of the amendment. That is how it is supposed to work. What we are voting on is “permission” for someone at Legislative Reference Bureau to draft the actual language the way they see fit. This isn’t the way constitutional amendments are supposed to work. The voters should vote on the actual language. Also, with respect to the advisory referendum item… apparently polling isn’t enough? Can’t our super majority figure this out without wasting the voters time on a NON BINDING referendum? They play us for fools….
Also vote NO on referendum questions 1 and 2!
We don’t want them to change our WI constitution? The question seems to ask if I want people with bad records held on higher bond but basically all the words boil down to…do you want to amend the constitution. I’m going to say NO as well.
Eh fuck it, even if you're not elligible still vote, you know the dems be cheating
Wish I could, I live near WI but am not a resident so I can't vote, though I know dozens of people who will be voting on it today. They've all sent out group chats to make sure people remember to vote and to vote for Dan Kelly. Hopefully things go well, but you know the dems. They won't be satisfied until the fix is in.
Is it just me? Why do the Referendum Questions always read like Trick Questions?
State of Wisconsin Conditions of Release Before Conviction Referendum -
QUESTION 1: “Conditions of release before conviction. Shall section 8 (2) of article I of the constitution be amended to allow a court to impose on an accused person being released before conviction conditions that are designed to protect the community from serious harm?”
Yes
No
State of Wisconsin Cash Bail Before Conviction Referendum -
QUESTION 2: “Cash bail before conviction. Shall section 8 (2) of article I of the constitution be amended to allow a court to impose cash bail on a person accused of a violent crime based on the totality of the circumstances, including the accused’s previous convictions for a violent crime, the probability that the accused will fail to appear, the need to protect the community from serious harm and prevent witness intimidation, and potential affirmative defenses?”
Yes
No
State of Wisconsin Welfare Benefits Referendum -
QUESTION 3: “Shall able-bodied, childless adults be required to look for work in order to receive taxpayer-funded welfare benefits?”
Yes
No
Questions 1 and 2 attempt to change the Wisconsin State Constitution. They do not give us the original wording, nor do they explain the thought process behind the changes. It is the belief of many that these changes could make the path to a gun grab easier and/or be used against Patriots standing against the government (Jan 6).
Thank you!
I’ll be voting this morning but the same machines are being used. In my village it’s paper ballots but they are scanned into a machine. We have one electronic voting machine but very few ever use it.
I’m leaving to vote shortly.