That's because they are carbon copies of the same 3 offences: Logging invoices, making an entry in ledgers and issuing a check with the accompanying check butt. The only difference is the dates.

Hard to read, unless you carefully trace the dates, which I started doing but it doesn't really reveal what the actual crime is. But I think this is part of the obfuscation. Big RA RA over the indictment, and the hiring of massive police presence (2M). but really? There is no crime here, just language about 'falsifying' something, but all we can see is records - what was supposed to be recorded if the records were false?

It's a bit like a joke of notching the side of the boat to prove that a fish was caught, as proof that the fish was caught where fishing is not allowed in a geographical area. - If you know what I mean - all that the notches actually prove is that those notches were made in the side of the boat.