The thread is old, and I doubt that many will read this comment, but whatevs.
Thinking more and more about Flynn, I ask the question: what is the impact of Flynn in terms of both narrative and actual events?
What does Flynn exhort people to do? Does what he exhorts them to do advantageous to the Maga movement or the restoration of America, for example? Or is it detrimental?
Is he encouraging people to "not vote, because it is all rigged" or is he saying "get out there, be responsible, don't wait for anyone to ride in on a white horse and bail you out"? For example.
What I know about Flynn is that in the totality of what his message is and what he is encouraging, it totally acts for the benefit of our movement (Maga, America, waking up the world) EXCEPT in the area of Q.
One might say, well, that shows he's controlled opposition. But I think controlled opposition invariably and subtly inspires or directs people towards actions that inhibit the good agenda, that work against it. So, if Flynn is exhorting people to step up, take responsibility, act now! then does this hurt America? I don't think so.
The only exception it seems to me is in the area of Q. Recently, Flynn has been putting forth a message that appears 'anti-Q'. But if that is the ONLY area where his efforts and work appear to be promoting a direction that disadvantages our work, then I'd say that may well be a big indicator that he's playing a role.
Truly negative assets or controlled opposition would more likely be subtly undermining the cause in a more broad way, I think. Discouraging the right things, promoting things that actually don't help.
That line of thinking gives me more confidence that Flynn is actually playing deep cover, and that he's "Q opposition" is more kayfebe than actual.
The thread is old, and I doubt that many will read this comment, but whatevs.
Thinking more and more about Flynn, I ask the question: what is the impact of Flynn in terms of both narrative and actual events?
What does Flynn exhort people to do? Does what he exhorts them to do advantageous to the Maga movement or the restoration of America, for example? Or is it detrimental?
Is he encouraging people to "not vote, because it is all rigged" or is he saying "get out there, be responsible, don't wait for anyone to ride in on a white horse and bail you out"? For example.
What I know about Flynn is that in the totality of what his message is and what he is encouraging, it totally acts for the benefit of our movement (Maga, America, waking up the world) EXCEPT in the area of Q.
One might say, well, that shows he's controlled opposition. But I think controlled opposition invariably and subtly inspires or directs people towards actions that inhibit the good agenda, that work against it. So, if Flynn is exhorting people to step up, take responsibility, act now! then does this hurt America? I don't think so.
The only exception it seems to me is in the area of Q. Recently, Flynn has been putting forth a message that appears 'anti-Q'. But if that is the ONLY area where his efforts and work appear to be promoting a direction that disadvantages our work, then I'd say that may well be a big indicator that he's playing a role.
Truly negative assets or controlled opposition would more likely be subtly undermining the cause in a more broad way, I think. Discouraging the right things, promoting things that actually don't help.
That line of thinking gives me more confidence that Flynn is actually playing deep cover, and that he's "Q opposition" is more kayfebe than actual.