<rant>
Listening to Devolution Power Hour from 2 days back.
The lads (PP, BB, JH) are discussing someone (apparently famous with a following, a pro-trumper) who went on an anti-Q rant blaming "Trust the plan and do nothing" Qanon, as well as "JFK jr is really Trump, Biden is not Biden, body doubles masks Qanon crap" for the election loss (Supreme Court?) in Wisconsin.
Such a good point. This is the exact reason why Q drew the very clear mark that what Q drops are about is not necessarily what anons are putting forward. There is a lot of crap stuff that has been pushed into the Q movement, either by deliberate shysters and disinfo artists or by people NOT actually focusing on Q content but on other theories while calling it Q. Too much of that stupid at best, damaging at worst content is, frankly, welcomed by too many people in the Q movement, and it does real damage to this movement and operation, and its ability to reach the normie world.
I've always despised that sort of crap, because I myself got sucked in a few times in the beginning, so I know the temptation. But it's so transparent, and pedes who attach to it seem so transparently to not be using critical thinking. Not Q methodology at all. Pseudo-Q. Which is a real shame.
It makes me realize there needs to be a LOT less tolerance for the dumb stuff. Not meaning it should be censored; rather, meaning that it should be called out when it rears its ugly head. The answer to fake crap is not censorship; it's community engagement with ferocious integrity.
As the lads in DPH point out, this is really our fault (collectively). We have let too much crap stuff enter into the Q movement sphere.
Seeking and tracking down truth requires diligence and responsibility. None of us are perfect, but it's really up to us to call out the crap stuff (low grade wacky conspiracy theory stuff) when it rears its ugly head.
<end rant>
It’s quite easy to disprove Q ever spoke about or confirmed any of the extras. There are multiple places an anon can go to literally type in a word or phrase, search, and send to the bitcher to say “hey look, what you’re saying is wrong.” Q kind of insulated itself from the noise by posting online and only online. You can’t necessarily go in and try to say “Q said blah jale blah about flatearth” because I can prove it didn’t.
But to push back a bit on your point, and I understand your point, just because Q doesn’t expressly mention it doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be spoken about. One of the points of Q, at least to me, is to usher in a great awakening. That doesn’t just mean guiding ourselves to disclosure about HRC, BO, and no name. It’s to help get our minds recovered from the hypnosis we’ve been living under. Take Millie Weaver’s documentary on data collection. That shit opened my eyes right up. I immediately went and started learning about operation paperclip and followed the trail from there. While data mining isn’t expressly a Q subject, it’s good to talk about. Human cloning isn’t a Q subject, but damn there is some wild theories out there that have the potential to go hand in hand with the community.
You can make the argument to go to conspiracies.win or whatnot, but to me it’s counter to the point of the great awakening. Let someone rant about vaccine mandates leading us down the road to the one world government, and let’s discuss it. There are parallels to Q in many of the extras. I, for one, don’t really care how anons are perceived by the outsiders who choose not to investigate Q on their own….. that’s literally the reason I, and most other anons, am here.
Thanks for the comments. A lot of good points.
I concur 100%.
However, if I can tweak the discussion or argument a bit, I'm talking about <crap> stuff, that isn't rational, logical, or evidence-based in terms of discussion and treatment. The JFK jnr thing, for example, is completely speculative and when folks go around believing he's going to show up in Dallas or join the Trump administration as vice president, it's more about a belief system than it is about actually applying Q methods. And that sort of low-grade beliefism is what the Cabal needs in order to be able to propagandize for the purpose of discrediting Q or the movement in the eyes of Joe Public.
Most definitely agree. But that is also why what the anons work on and what the Q movement actually is or becomes is important in the context of the normie world. How many millions (tens, hundreds?) have woken up because of Q? Either because they have investigated Q or because someone near them has investigated Q and raised certain ideas that Q opened the door to?
From that viewpoint, it's damned important how 'outsiders' perceive Q or the Q movement.
Which is actually an important feature of GAW, as it has been created and designed as a palatable landing pad for normies or truthers wanting to get their heads around Q.