https://twitter.com/RWMaloneMD/status/1645185141105360899
Regarding pseudo-mRNA vaccines for livestock and pets.
"First, do not harm" is the first rule of being a physician. It is unfortunate that proper testing and evaluation of was not done for the pseudo-mRNA human C-19 "vaccines". The large adverse event profile is a five alarm fire that is not being addressed. Without proper testing (including as a gene therapy product), they should not be used for anything in the future, IMO.
Without transparency for how these are being tested for the livestock and pet market-just no.
We can no longer trust the gov. to ensure safety without transparency.
There are a host of safety and transparency issues that have not been resolved. The government and big pharma (who are jointly developing these pseudo-mRNA vaccines) must be transparent. The data on safety must be made available. They must be tested as gene therapy products. The meat must undergo evaluation. And this is just a start. The safety of our food supply is of paramount importance. There is no way that these products should be used in animals, until this is done. Yet- Merck already has these products as custom formulations on the market now for swine (Sequivity). How did THAT happen? Where is the safety data? Where is the labelling?
We deserve a government that has the best interests of people, farmers in mind.
Congress needs to step in.
Just because we "can," does not mean we should.
I have a lot more to say on this - so stay tuned.
When could we EVER trust the gov. to ensure our safety? The entire history of the FDA, to name only one example, is filled with examples of corporate profit and convenience taking precedence over human safety and well-being. William Faloon of the Life Extension Foundation has called the FDA "the number one cause of death for American citizens" and written numerous articles on FDA malfeasance, corruption, and incompetence (for instance, Lethal Delays), which includes this:
It took nine years in court, but Faloon prevailed against the FDA's attempt to shut him down.
What kind of agency tries to imprison someone for providing truthful and sometimes life-saving information to the public?
At this point, the answer is: Any federal agency in America, apparently.
If your corporation makes 100 billion in profit and pays 10 billion in fines and settlements for poisoning people. Where is the downside? Is anyone ever held personally responsible? No