I do not know yet. I'll do some research and try to remember to get back to you. That is a great question- and if any hypothesis has any contradicting evidence, it needs to be thrown out and the position reevaluated.
Mainstream science stands up to zero scrutiny. This is why people are called anti-vaxxers, anti-science, conspiracy theorists instead of having their questions answered. Because the answers are lies. Read my later response, it's quite a lot more information, but it explains the world so much better and in a predictive manner, rather than just chalking up unexplained events as "luck" or "randomness".
I do not know yet. I'll do some research and try to remember to get back to you. That is a great question- and if any hypothesis has any contradicting evidence, it needs to be thrown out and the position reevaluated.
Mainstream science stands up to zero scrutiny. This is why people are called anti-vaxxers, anti-science, conspiracy theorists instead of having their questions answered. Because the answers are lies. Read my later response, it's quite a lot more information, but it explains the world so much better and in a predictive manner, rather than just chalking up unexplained events as "luck" or "randomness".
It's what immediately jumps to mind with the virus question. I'd be curious to hear what you find