You would be amazed how many important and tenet changing pieces of information, not to mention changes in translation were left out of the "final cut" that The Church (and the resultant book) says is "complete and 100% true."
No one looks because tenets are core beliefs, all founded upon a cirular argument. Can't change core beliefs, that would be heresy. Heresy is a word that carried over from the original use by The Church all the way until today. Thus, beliefs are controlled. Evidence is ignored.
The Church still retains full control, despite (because of) the "reformations" which were themselves either initially acts of controlled opposition, or the resultant institutions were later taken over by The Church and made into it (there is evidence for both assessments and they are not mutually exclusive ideas).
This is the next veil in The Matrix. Seeing that all of today's religions are Controlled Opposition. Perhaps this evidence will encourage others to dig in, allowing for the possibility to challenge core beliefs, which is the most difficult endeavor we humans take in this Great Awakening.
The Biblical writings have been preserved throughout the millennia by way of the thousands of manuscripts and copies currently in existence. Having more manuscripts and copies actually helps biblical critics work backwards to accurately represent what the original writings said (up to a 99.8% accuracy). No one group (including the Catholics) could have sole say in what the ancient manuscripts actually said because there were thousands of manuscripts in other locations not in Catholicism's possession. The vast number of Manuscripts acted as a checks and balance system against any unwarranted change or edits.
There is no other book (or collection of books) that compares to the Biblical writings when it comes to the number and quality of manuscripts in our possession.
The Bible we posses in our hands today IS what the original authors wrote down.
This! Everyone is so quick to undermine the Bible itself by way of the secret agendas of Catholicism, but never look into how reliable the manuscripts and timelines were and WHY certain books were excluded. It’s a good thing that the books were curated. Should there not have been a standard for being included in the most important book in history? Nah! Chuck any old thing you found in the ground in there! Not defending Catholicism, I have issues there, but the early church is not the same as the Roman Catholic system, and certain books SHOULD have been excluded.
You would be amazed how many important and tenet changing pieces of information, not to mention changes in translation were left out of the "final cut" that The Church (and the resultant book) says is "complete and 100% true."
No one looks because tenets are core beliefs, all founded upon a cirular argument. Can't change core beliefs, that would be heresy. Heresy is a word that carried over from the original use by The Church all the way until today. Thus, beliefs are controlled. Evidence is ignored.
The Church still retains full control, despite (because of) the "reformations" which were themselves either initially acts of controlled opposition, or the resultant institutions were later taken over by The Church and made into it (there is evidence for both assessments and they are not mutually exclusive ideas).
This is the next veil in The Matrix. Seeing that all of today's religions are Controlled Opposition. Perhaps this evidence will encourage others to dig in, allowing for the possibility to challenge core beliefs, which is the most difficult endeavor we humans take in this Great Awakening.
The Biblical writings have been preserved throughout the millennia by way of the thousands of manuscripts and copies currently in existence. Having more manuscripts and copies actually helps biblical critics work backwards to accurately represent what the original writings said (up to a 99.8% accuracy). No one group (including the Catholics) could have sole say in what the ancient manuscripts actually said because there were thousands of manuscripts in other locations not in Catholicism's possession. The vast number of Manuscripts acted as a checks and balance system against any unwarranted change or edits.
There is no other book (or collection of books) that compares to the Biblical writings when it comes to the number and quality of manuscripts in our possession.
The Bible we posses in our hands today IS what the original authors wrote down.
This! Everyone is so quick to undermine the Bible itself by way of the secret agendas of Catholicism, but never look into how reliable the manuscripts and timelines were and WHY certain books were excluded. It’s a good thing that the books were curated. Should there not have been a standard for being included in the most important book in history? Nah! Chuck any old thing you found in the ground in there! Not defending Catholicism, I have issues there, but the early church is not the same as the Roman Catholic system, and certain books SHOULD have been excluded.