There is no chance that Hitler was on the side of the bankers.
If you learn about his early adulthood, his failure as an art student (because he actually created good art in an era that appreciated depravity), and then his time as a soldier in WWI (where he could not advance beyond corporal because his captain thought that Hitler "lacked leadership skills"), and then you understand what was happening in post-WW1 Germany and Hitler's attempt to counter the communists ... when you put all the pieces of the puzzle together, along with his outlawing usury and arresting Louis Rothschild, you cannot possibly come to the conclusion that he had any backing at all from the banksters.
Hitler was a deranged Idolater that had mire in common with the communists that history lets on. That being said we should have fought the russians instead because germany would have been an easier threat to deal with afterwards
There is no chance that Hitler was on the side of the bankers.
If you learn about his early adulthood, his failure as an art student (because he actually created good art in an era that appreciated depravity), and then his time as a soldier in WWI (where he could not advance beyond corporal because his captain thought that Hitler "lacked leadership skills"), and then you understand what was happening in post-WW1 Germany and Hitler's attempt to counter the communists ... when you put all the pieces of the puzzle together, along with his outlawing usury and arresting Louis Rothschild, you cannot possibly come to the conclusion that he had any backing at all from the banksters.
He even created his own money.
Zero chance, and really it is just blasphemy.
If you understand the mechanics of "how he created his own money", you will understand it was backed by the Banksters.
Hitler was a deranged Idolater that had mire in common with the communists that history lets on. That being said we should have fought the russians instead because germany would have been an easier threat to deal with afterwards