Basically, our one Intel Agency leaked this to NYT to create a distraction. Read the entire Sundance article and it's make some sense.
Whether Sundance's Motive and Answer is the correct one, we are all smart enough to understand that this was a leak by our on Intel agencies to achieve some purpose.
Make sure to watch this video that came out 18 hours before the leak construct.
"The only question you really need to ask yourself is, what aspect of my liberty does this intelligence operation support the removal of?"
"After all… if only we had the Restrict Act in place, then none of this classified information surfacing on social media would be such a concern, right? Right?"
I don't believe this for a moment. Here is what I believe.
Basically, our one Intel Agency leaked this to NYT to create a distraction. Read the entire Sundance article and it's make some sense.
Whether Sundance's Motive and Answer is the correct one, we are all smart enough to understand that this was a leak by our on Intel agencies to achieve some purpose.
Make sure to watch this video that came out 18 hours before the leak construct.
Here is an article today from Sundance: The Full Surveillance Power of the U.S. Govt Could Not Find the Classified Intel Leaker, But the Media Did…
"The only question you really need to ask yourself is, what aspect of my liberty does this intelligence operation support the removal of?"
"After all… if only we had the Restrict Act in place, then none of this classified information surfacing on social media would be such a concern, right? Right?"