There’s a very large body of evidence connected to this miracle that has been happening continuously for many centuries. That outweighs a casual Internet comment.
He doesnt. He’s just a scoffer and a mocker. Truth is lost on him and his kind.
They have a different fire awaiting them. But they won’t believe it so I guess it can’t be true…🤪
Another thing is that archeology can't prove the connection of one major religion to Jerusalem, since Mohammed never went to Jerusalem while alive. He supposedly touched down on the Temple Mount on his way to heaven.
"And folks, if you look to your left with cameras ready, you'll see the famous burning bush followed by..."
Do you have support for your claim that this is inauthentic?
Do you have support for your claim that it is?
There’s a very large body of evidence connected to this miracle that has been happening continuously for many centuries. That outweighs a casual Internet comment.
Your hearsay outweighs legitimate skepticism? Give me one research vector to support this "large body of evidence."
For 500 years people thought flies spontaneously spawned from mud. Any mud could create a fly. That is, until biology discovered maggots.
Point is, duration of a story doesn't provide immunity from truth.
He doesnt. He’s just a scoffer and a mocker. Truth is lost on him and his kind. They have a different fire awaiting them. But they won’t believe it so I guess it can’t be true…🤪
This mockery is obvious since I assume you're fully aware God's dwelling place is far from Jerusalem.
Another thing is that archeology can't prove the connection of one major religion to Jerusalem, since Mohammed never went to Jerusalem while alive. He supposedly touched down on the Temple Mount on his way to heaven.